Jul 20, 2006

#3 UPEACE Toronto

In case you might want to study and learn how to achieve peace:

There are many, many links, for example UPeace Toronto

Training of Trainers Seminar on "Religious Identity, Islam and Peacebuilding". 13-16 June 2006 - Dushanbe, Tajikistan. [....]

International Conference On "Strategies for Peace with Development in Africa: The Role of Education, Training and Research . 12-14 June 2006 - Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. [....]

Curriculum Development Workshop on Education for Peace in Sudan. 3-4 May 2006 - Khartoum, Sudan.

In cooperation with the Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research, the University for Peace (UPEACE) Africa Programme held a Curriculum Development Workshop on Education for Peace in Sudan in Khartoum, 03-04 May 2006.

Earth Charter Delegates Meet with President-Elect Oscar Arias. 06 April 2006 - San José, Costa Rica.

Delegates from Earth Charter International and the University for Peace met yesterday with President-Elect Oscar Arias of Costa Rica to discuss areas of potential collaboration during Mr. Arias' term of office. Mr. Arias, a Nobel Peace Prize winner who was recently re-elected after years away from political office, will be inaugurated on 8 May 2006. The Costa Rican government has traditionally been a strong supporter of the Earth Charter in international fora, such as the 2002 World Summit on Sustainable Development and the 2004 World Congress of the IUCN.


[The ex-Rector is Maurice Strong. Was he in Canada for this CIDA lecture?]

UPEACE Rector Emeritus Lectures at CIDA: The Prospects for Peace and Security in the 21st Century. 06 April 2006 - CIDA, Ottawa.

UPEACE Rector Emeritus Martin Lees provided a sobering lecture for CIDA staff, as part of CIDA's Poverty Reduction Speaker Series.

[....] Advanced Studies in Environmental Diplomacy. 1 April-31 May 2006 - Geneva, Switzerland.

UPEACE students stage Model United Nations Conference 2006. 16 March 2006 - San José, Costa Rica.

The fourth annual ... (UPMUNC 2006) is taking place at the headquarters of the University for Peace in San José, Costa Rica. [....]

A Seminar on "Religious Identity, Islam and Peacebuilding was held in Tajikistan . 20-23 February 2006 - Dushhanbe, Tajikistan.

... a Norway-funded project. The seminar was led by UPEACE Professors Amr Abdalla, Dean for Academic Studies, and Mahmoud Hamid, Department of Environmental Security.


[....] Welcome students from Dual Master's Degree in Natural Resources and Sustainable Development. 02 January 2006 - San José, Costa Rica. [....]

Dec 15, 2005

Follow the Yellow--Red--Brick Road #1

The Universities: Centers for Intellectual Exploration of Ideas and Free Speech . . . or are they?

Must staff and students toe the line and voice correct speak -- politically correct thought, for example, on women's issues...as well as on other issues?...Is it possible that there are re-education camps coming? Before you dismiss that as mad, read on. They won't be necessary in Canada, given the pervasive control exercised by a combination of government and other organizations, all with the willing help of right-thinking individuals.

Robert Fulford: Harvard's "Summers performs the loyalty dance" -- "a self-criticism meeting" -- "a defeat for free speech and honest inquiry at the heart of American [as in Canadian] academic life."

Note: "a self-criticism meeting"

Mob rule at Harvard -- "a sad commentary on academic freedom in America" Barbara Kay, National Post, Mar. 2, 05 (or Mar. 1, 05)


[. . . . ]In a classic mobbing episode, the underlying "crime" is typically either trifling or non-existent. The accused at first assumes his friends and colleagues will rush to defend him. But if the critics are able to cast their case in politically fashionable terms -- the fight against racism or sexism, most commonly -- then personal loyalties go out the window. People rush to join the torch-bearing crowd, lest the accused's crimes tarnish them as well.

Mobbing was first articulated as a syndrome by Swedish psychologist Heinz Leymann in the early '80s. He defines it as "an impassioned, collective campaign by co-workers to exclude, punish and humiliate a targeted worker."

[. . . . ] a 12-point profile Professor Westhues has developed to identify true mobbing. Amongst the criteria:

[. . . . ] The only way to combat this pernicious virus is for theorists to shake off their fixation on gender and race equity, the ideological intoxicant that drives normally sober academics to punch-drunk witch hunts. Instead, universities should concentrate on serious efforts to make campuses open to a diversity of opinion.


Meanwhile, instead of undermining his own cause and that of academic freedom, it would help if Summers started acting like a free man, and not a Soviet-era thought criminal.





Follow the yellow--red brick road by going back a bit.

Global Governance and Paul Martin April 3, 2005

http://
frosthitstherhubarb.blogspot.com/
2005_04_03_frosthitstherhubarb_archive.html

Peter C. Newman: "A blueprint for world government " -- Paul Martin's vision for the globe, National Post, Apr. 2, 05

http://
www.canada.com/national/nationalpost/news/
issuesideas/story.html?id=f9a8498d-c216-42
25-a861-da2d956ab3f3

[. . . . ] Now, as his government's definitive (and much postponed) foreign policy review is set to appear, I went back to my notes of those conversations. These were the idealistic ramblings of an ambitious politician who'd plugged himself into the seismic upheavals shaping the global economy. "We must develop a much stronger conscience in terms of our responsibility to others," he told me. "It's nonsensical, for example, that there is no international environmental organization of stature or a body than can deal with a tragic epidemic like AIDS."

What Martin had in mind was nothing less than spearheading the move toward a limited form of world government. His ambitions recognized few limits. He once confided to me that he wanted to duplicate internationally, especially in the underdeveloped world, what we do domestically, including a global system of equalization payments, free education up to the high school level, the formation of global instead of national health care and a universal banking system. [. . . . ]


A bureaucrat in every pot, via Jack's Newswatch

http://
www.montesolberg.com/2005/
03/bureaucrat-in-every-pot.htm


[. . . . ] Did you know that the cost of our bureaucracy has gone up 77% since 1996/97? [. . . . ]



Defeat of Bills C-31, C-32 -- "the opposition parties joined forces and defeated Bills C-31 and C-32, the bills to split the Foreign Affairs Department and the International Trade Department." -- "things came out of the" Foreign Affairs Committee that caused the critic and the leadership to say they didn't want to support the bills. "-- "there are problems" The Hill Times, Feb. 21, 2005, Kate Malloy and F. Abbas Rana


Dan MacTeague . . . . It's under the authority of the Public Service Rearrangement and Transfer of Duties Act that allows the governor in council to transfer portions of the public service and ministerial powers and duties and functions from one part of the public service or from one minister to another.

[. . . . ] An order in council passed in December 2003 when Prime Minister Paul Martin (LaSalle-Émard, Qué.) took power [. . . . ]


Frost Hits the Rhubarb, March 2, 2005: Originally, that post had an entry "Canadians are Patsies -- & -- UN Global Control Crowd at it Again -- Anti-Canadianism & More -- Updated" . . . but it seems that this, like other things, disappeared into that great maw -- Gremlins. The following is still there:

* Note This! UN -- Women's Rights -- or Wrongs? -- Appropriate Moral Authority? -- & Petition [The link to this petition was . . . changed, rendered inoperable. Citizens making their views known: unacceptable? ]


The last item provides an example of how the global governance crowd through NGO's and the UN are able to bypass the electorate -- before busy citizens know what hit them. This item will be similar to what occurred with the Kyoto Accord, in that the global governance crowd are active again. Think about what Kyoto is [intended] to bring to Canadians, particularly to business; you will pay. Think also of who have something to gain from Kyoto.

Think then, of the women who have the time for international conferences on women's "rights" and women's "health issues"--euphemisms for abortion, etc--and read this. [. . . . ]


Look, for example at what has been the influence of one Canadian who was at the Montreal climate conference on the Kyoto Accord, the UN's Deputy to Kofi Annan, Louise Frechette. [ When a link disappears or is corrupted in a post, it causes me look again and further. ]

FHTR Mar. 2, 05 -- Header: "Cdn. Patsies: UNSCAM-Cdn. Connections, Dingwall-Via Rail-$133,000, Revoke Citizenship Terrorist Fateh Kamel, JC & Dictator, CRTC Head-PQ & PM Friend"

A search for Louise Frechetter brought this. [Note that I mistyped the name, adding an 'r' ]

Gremlins: link missing

LOUISE FRÉCHETTE DEPUTY SECRETARY-GENERAL

http://
www.un.org/aboutun/DSG/dsgbio.htm

Louise Fréchette is the first Deputy Secretary-General of the United Nations. A national of Canada, she assumed her duties on 2 March 1998, after having been appointed by Secretary-General Kofi Annan.

The post of Deputy Secretary-General was established by the General Assembly at the end of 1997 as part of the reform of the United Nations, to help manage Secretariat operations and to ensure coherence of activities and programmes. The purpose was also to elevate the Organization’s profile and leadership in the economic and social spheres. The Deputy Secretary-General assists the Secretary-General in the full range of his responsibilities and also may represent the United Nations at conferences and official functions. She chairs the Steering Committee on Reform and Management Policy and the Advisory Board of the United Nations Fund for International Partnerships (UNFIP), which handles relations with the foundation set up by Ted Turner in support of the United Nations.

Before joining the United Nations, Ms. Fréchette was the Deputy Minister of National Defence of Canada from 1995 to 1998. Prior to that, she was Associate Deputy Minister in her country’s Department of Finance. She served as Permanent Representative of Canada to the United Nations from 1992 to 1995. [. . . . ]

In January 1991 she became Assistant Deputy Minister for Economic Policy and Trade Competitiveness [in Canada]


Interestingly, the trilingual (Eng. Fr. Span.) Frechette has received an honourary doctorate from, among others, Kyung Hee University in Seoul.


An insider, along with Maurice Strong and others. Check her part in the UN oil-for-food scandal; she played a part which may or may not have been an acceptable use of her obvious talents. (posts on this site)


Link for the above: Frost Hits the Rhubarb week of Feb. 27 - Mar. 5, 05

http://
frosthitstherhubarb.blogspot.com/
2005_02_27_frosthitstherhubarb_archive.html



Follow the Yellow--Red--Brick Road #2

Note: What follows is lengthy but I believe it has more impact now that some time has passed and an election is in the offing. It is time to consider this government's priorities. The place to start is with the Budget. Anything in green is important or has implications while red is used to draw attention to others. I have commented liberally throughout, usually coloured blue, but not always.

I believe that the first link developed a problem, too, so maybe people did not get the file nor the full impact of the PM & Team's plans. NJC



The Budget 2005: Chapter 6 -- "Meeting our Global Responsibilities" -- the chapter with security information -- Note what is emphasized in chapter 6 -- Budget 2005, Chapter 6: Meeting our Global Responsibilities - the chapter with security information

http://
www.fin.gc.ca/budget05/bp/bpc6e.htm#security

This chapter includes several aspects before it gets to what we usually think of as protecting Canadians' security-- RCMP and CSIS -- "eye-catching blocks. Note what is highlighted" -- much more emphasis on the "global" than on the "national" and this chapter seems heavily weighted in emphasis toward trade and business.




deployment of officers to overseas ports, enhance Canada’s competitiveness, contribute to a more equitable, sustainable, and democratic world, and help protect Canadians, renew the Public Diplomacy Program, an important instrument to gain greater influence for Canada internationally


Search:

contribute to a more equitable, sustainable, and democratic world [Meanwhile, the 'democratic deficit' has not exactly been fixed in government-controlled Canada, aided by the helpful, enabling media ]

Setting a New Course for Canada’s International Policy

Global citizenship

Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA)

New Resources for International Assistance

Debt Relief [ I just listened (AM Dec.13, 05) to two female CBC presenters discussing (apoplectic over ) Stephen Harper's plans to spend money on the military, DART, defence and I thought of this budget and PM & Team's emphasis on spending money abroad . . . perhaps in Africa? A much better use of OPM? ]

Canada’s Commitment to Africa [CIDA?]


health and economic development [Read more on the UN influence in Canada -- on this website -- some below, some posted Dec. 6, 05. ]

$300 million in additional funding

The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria ($140 million), and the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI) ($160 million). [Check FHTR, Dec. 11, 05: "Was Maurice Strong at the Climate Conference? Questions: Trent & International Consortium on Anti-Virals (ICAV), Emergency Preparedness & Navy"]

$42 million in funding to support the Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI) [ Is there any connection between this concern for health and the Africa concerns? See "Pulp MIll Workers Urged to Build Arts Industry" & UNB: World Bank, Industry, Educ. Ambassadorial Reps "Working with Africa Workshop" Is there any connection between GPEI and our Glorious Leader's connection to Medisys? (Stephen Taylor, Toronto Tory, MKBraaten and others.) See an article on this website.

Also note how the UN influences the Atlantic Human Rights Institute, well-meaning people certainly, but I still think manipulated to an extent by government and UN-Speak. Read on. ]

Additional Funds for Peace and Security -- [Check the emphasis in this section.]

Canada Corps will engage Canadians in helping to improve governance in fragile or failed states [Where? China? Africa? ]

Nurturing a Prosperous Private Sector in Developing Countries

[. . . ] Prime Minister Paul Martin and former Mexican President Ernesto Zedillo

"Unleashing Entrepreneurship."
-- [Who is going to unleash it and where? Who are part of this?]

The Martin-Zedillo report


Related: FHTR Mar. 6, 05 - Mar. 12, 05: Compare: "Pulp MIll Workers Urged to Build Arts Industry" & UNB: World Bank, Industry, Educ. Ambassadorial Reps "Working with Africa Workshop" -- or here

the approaches that will best help African entrepreneurs -- [Check a day long workshop from FHTR week of Mar. 3, 05 in which I noted the difference between the power gathered to discuss African needs and the paucity of the help afforded one group of Canadian unfortunates, the pulp mill workers out of work because of the closing of the mill at Nackawic, NB]

Compare: "Pulp MIll Workers Urged to Build Arts Industry" & UNB: World Bank, Industry, Educ. Ambassadorial Reps "Working with Africa Workshop" -- ACOA, CIDA and a few other acronyms, ambassadors and powerful, connected individuals -- e.g. people with academic credentials -- or here

There is another section possibly of interest: New Illuminati, Cdn. Aid to China, China textiles, Bud Talkinghorn: Dear Lou Dobbs -- [The Multiculturalism Hucksters. The Rights Advocates. The Equality-for-All Gang.]

the Canada Investment Fund for Africa (CIFA)

$200 million in private investment into Africa. -- [If it is 'private', why is this mentioned in the budget? Are Canadian taxpayers paying or are private individuals or businesses?]

An initial $100 million allocation

provide risk capital for investment in Africa.

The Forum of Federations -- [What is this? What is its mandate? -- Is this related to the information in a post "Media Hatchet Job in the Maritimes", Dec. 6, 05 which ties in the UN and its influence in Canada? Search: ECOSOC and Summits just below (a few items omitted here) ]

http://
frosthitstherhubarb.blogspot.com/
2005/12/media-hatchet-job-in-maritimes-global.html





World Trade Organization (WTO)
Topic 1: Role of the L20 in Trade Negotiations
Topic 2: Review of the Doha Development Agenda
(UNICEF)
(UNEP)
Topic 1: Climate Change
Topic 2: Biodiversity and GMO's [What are GMO's? ]
United Nations Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO)
Futuristic Committee
2050: World food supply and production capacity have drastically depleted
United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS
Topic 1: Building an Intersectional Model
Topic 2: HIV/AIDS, Security, and Humanitarian Response
(UNESCO)


$690 million in new investments

enhance the Government’s capacity in intelligence gathering -- [ Would that connect with UN control of the Internet? Do you suppose our Glorilous Leader is after the terrorists . . . or is it Canadians who catch his Blunderbuss & Bafflegab in the details? You? ]

$1 billion [. . . .] in the areas of emergency planning and

purchase antivirals, a further $34 million [Search: Was Maurice Strong at the Climate Conference? Questions: Trent & International Consortium on Anti-Virals (ICAV), Emergency Preparedness & Navy ]

Canada intends to seek the presidency of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF),

participate in other regional bodies such as the Asia-Pacific Group on Money Laundering and the Caribbean Financial Action Task Force. [ IMHO, Ironies abound.]

intricate networks of financial transactions. . . . FINTRAC

Integrated Proceeds of Crime (POC) . . . RCMP . . . Department of Justice Canada legal counsel

over five years

Container Security Initiative (CSI),

work with the United States and Mexico to increase the security of critical transportation and communications networks [Think about that and whether Mexico has been able to stem the drug dealers on the border with and crossing into the US. Would Mexico make our best partner for security? ]

contribute to a more equitable, sustainable, and democratic world . . . Public Diplomacy Program

Enhancing Our Relationships With Overseas Markets




support new international science and technology (S&T) initiatives . . . India and China. . . . promote collaborative research between Canadian and foreign scientists and technologists . . . the use of cleaner and more efficient forms of energy . . . helping brand Canadian environmental technology abroad.

Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada -- [. . . .] an endowment of $50 million. . . to build networks between Canadian and Asian business leaders, and to unearth potential market opportunities that will benefit both regions. In order to improve and reflect modern governance and accountability practices, the Government will undertake to amend the 1984 Asia-Pacific Foundation of Canada Act. [Check that "foundation" and the act by which it came into being.]


global peace operations

Canadian values as a guide

Table 6.2

Meeting Our Global Responsibilities

Helping the poorest of the world -- Total after five years: 3,436 (millions of dollars)

Canada’s commitment to Africa -- Total after five years: 342 (millions of dollars)

Ensuring the security of Canadians -- including: . . . . Total after five years: 433 (millions of dollars)

End of the excerpts from the budget 2005.


Canadians' security $$$ includes building bridges -- so just where does our security fit into Paul Martin & Team's plans for the globe and particularly, Asia and Africa?



Related:

Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada -- Business News and more -- aet up in 1984 -- "APF Canada receives financial support from Foreign Affairs Canada, the Canadian International Development Agency and Western Economic Diversification Canada."

http://
www.asiapacificbusiness.ca/index.cfm


Updates & China Conference-Vancouver Port, Maurice Strong-China Car Salesman, China's Bricklin & Strong, China-Copied Chevy Design?

http://
newsjunkiecanada.blogspot.com/
2005_01_04_newsjunkiecanada_archive.html

There are several posts on FHTR Jan. 4, 2004 that are related to PM's global concerns, for example:




* Business: The China Connection, Canada China Business Council--Founding Sponsors, the Networks, Connections & Other Information
* Canada China Business Council (CCBC) -- its mandate
* Founding Sponsors -- [This list -- includes: Desmarais and Maurice Strong, Li Ka-Shing and many more]


Especially enlightening in relation to globalization:

Philosophical Underpinnings to the Budget 2005 -- "a new experiment in central planning"

Terence Corcoran: Groping in the dark with Ralph Goodale Financial Post, Feb. 26, 05

http://
www.canada.com/national/nationalpost/
news/story.html?id=667aa10b-85
52-433b-8703-4e1c663472ae




Oskar Lange (1904-65), former chairman of the Polish State Economic Council, sometime Stalinist and major contributor to the economics of socialism

[. . . . ] The appendix, known as Annex 4 to the budget . . . .

[. . . . ] "The government intends to go further, and will do so in successive budgets," setting the stage for a new experiment in central planning.

Andrew Coyne's Graph which accompanies his explanation of the budget splurge -- Andrew Coyne on the Budget: A splurge without precedent February 26, 2005

http://
andrewcoyne.com/2005/02/
splurge-without-precedent.html

Martin's Past Choices Create Dire Consequences for Canadian Military says MP Jay Hill on the occasion of Paul Martin's sending Canadian troops to Haiti, March 5, 2004 -- Jay Hill: "The Prime Minister can't brag to Canadians that he slew the deficit yet not take responsibility for the impact of his $20-billion in cuts to Canada's military."

We've become a nation of enablers -- "Clearly, then, Canadian taxpayers are in an abusive relationship with the federal Liberals" -- brilliantly done! Lorrie Goldstein, Toronto Sun, Feb. 27, 05

http://
www.canoe.ca/NewsStand/Columnists/Toronto/
Lorrie_Goldstein/2005/02/27/944222.html


RCMP Underfunded, Undermanned -- Marijuana Grow Ops Spread -- Yet Government Won't Address the Problem -- Why? MP Chuck Cadman CPC on the Grow Ops




"Closing an RCMP lab? Government has been awash in cash -- sponsorship, gun registry, etc. Why don't they cut out the waste and corruption before closing an RCMP forensic lab? But this is just one problem. The RCMP are short a minimun 2500 officers . . . . "

Hansard: Mr. Chuck Cadman (Surrey North, CPC): Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to rise to debate Bill C-10, this government's feeble attempt to address the possession and production of marijuana in Canada.


Rest in peace, Chuck Cadman. We remember you and applaud your efforts.




Follow the Yellow--Red--Brick Road #3

Follow the Yellow--Red--Brick Road #3


Canadians' Taxes, Globalization and Other Agendas

I hope it will become clearer as you read that Canadians' taxes are being funnelled to use in support of Paul Martin's globalization agenda...and other agendas.

In my opinion, there is the insidious hand of Big Government backed by UN activism in Canada: for example:

* to funnel money to indoctrinate students at university (See FHTR Dec. 6, 05, "Media Hatchet Job in the Maritimes ... Global TV 'News' " -- or a shorter post on it today, the news that started this quest to learn more about political influence in academe."

* to institute child care under the guise of helping parents--child care that excludes parents' desires and especially the stay-at-home parents' wishes; it does not allow them to spend their money on the care they wish, but which will afford Big Government even more avenues to promote right-thought

This matters to Canadians when, Paul Martin & Team want to use taxpayer money to fund institutional daycares (think control--by regulation of the daycare centers, for example, and which will entail another massive bureaucracy ) and, incidentally, the pre-school children may be properly schooled in the proper attitudes / correct thought / right thought from their earliest years -- something their parents might not be adequately trained in. Parents have just done daycare since Adam and Eve--Is that comment too Christian? Would government improve upon parental care? What comes with the need to fund institutional daycare, but not to fund non-institutional daycare? I think it is control over the attitudes and how children think--the control that is insidious because seemingly so benign, so desirous of helping it seems, that hard questions won't be asked. This then moves on--has already--to the schools and then to post-secondary institutions. Much that should be, will not be discussed. Certain topics will be outside the realm of what 'nice' Canadians think, by virtue of their training from earliest childhood.


* to initiate projects which will funnel money to academics which may or may not be a wise use of Canadians' tax dollars if those dollars are intended to help natives, for example, though they might usefully be part of a larger package of attacks upon dysfunction in many areas, from housing to governance to the drug addicted children (about which, more below).

* to enlist well-meaning people, but particularly the UN, in his plans -- The money allotted--and this is only the beginning of it--will have the imprimatur of the UN, based on its stated interest in the preservation of Heritage Languages. This allows Big Government to expand across Canada and in various departments, such as education--normally a provincial concern but with the natives, there is federal input--as well as the Languages Commissioners' Department.

* to court the good will of natives themselves and that has implications much beyond education -- in areas such as ownership of resources, governance, who represent the natives involved, and more

What is my point? I see more social engineering, more control, more long-laid plans coming to fruition. I have noted more expansion of government into all areas of life. Is what follows a genuine desire to change the lives of natives or is it something more?

Paul Martin needs the good will of the natives in the North; in my view, he must cultivate the people necessary to carry out even further long-laid plans.

Martin's usurping of a sitting Prime Minister revealed him to be a plotter and planner, par excellence. In my opinion, he is using the UN and it is using him.




Follow the Yellow--Red--Brick Road #4

Background: Tracing Threads and Networks

What follow are what I consider the main points of the post Media Hatchet Job in the Maritimes ... Global TV 'News' posted Dec. 6, 05

http://
frosthitstherhubarb.blogspot.com/
2005/12/media-hatchet-job-in-maritimes-global.html

I followed the links from GlobalTV's biased account of their 'news', negative on Conservatives' chances in the Maritimes; I moved backward, to find out where that search would lead, the source of what I heard. Actually, given the interviewees, that news item had threads running from a university course to government funding for UN global perspectives--rights and more--to the Liberal government of Canada and globalization. My search moved:

* through the GlobalTV news and its reporter (Is she a graduate of STU journalism?)

* through the St. Thomas University Chair of the Political Science Department, Thomas Bateman, whose views were featured, along with his students and a few others

* via the course offerings, as described on the university website, heavily influenced by socialist / leftist thinking ... to

* The web of connections through

* STU's Distinctive Programs -- Journalism, Interdisciplinary Studies, CANIMUN leading to a government of Canada Exchanges Program -- That's tax dollars, I believe.

* Research Centres & Endowed Chairs -- Atlantic Human Rights Centre (AHRC) -- Endowed by whom or what organization?

My Comments and Observations as of Dec. 15, 05

Whose rights? Are there discussions:

* of the individual citizen's rights (e.g. to be free of fear, of international criminals and guns, gangs and drugs), the rights of citizenship over the rights of non-citizens, perhaps the rights of our own poor over the far-away poor, such as in Africa or elsewhere

* of national rights, among them being consideration of our own Canadian family, the ones who pay the bills, first?

Or is the emphasis on, e.g. global rights such as

* HIV/AIDS patients' rights to medicines -- e.g. Africa
* refugee rights
-- e.g. to enter Canada with or without documents, with forged documents and still be able to remain and maybe even fight deportation using Canadian taxpayers' money
* Refugee / immigrant rights -- e.g. the right to remain in Canada whatever the wrongdoing (criminality, torture and torture funding, terrorist sleeper activity or those who may be, etc.) instead of being returned to wherever they emanated from, to face what might be torture -- and which is often later found to be lies anyway?

All of this has tended to make it impossible, it seems, for Canadians to protect ourselves against the world's drug and criminal gangs, free loaders, terrorists and other assorted "rights" claimants -- if we follow the Charter which is based on the UN concept . . . or is it the Liberal-government-mediated concept of rights that has emanated from the UN?

Is there a hierarchy of rights with Canadians at the pinnacle in their own country? Or is that interpretation to be left to the undemocratic states presently running the UN?


* Interdisciplinary Studies -- focus on emerging issues -- Which ones and who decides -- on what basis? Did they ask you? They didn't canvass me. I wouldn't be so suspicious if it weren't for the rest; read on.

* Academic Exchanges -- with their President's Travel Awards available to selected students in support of . . .

* The United Nations Association in Canada (UNA-Canada) -- "a national charitable organization" whose "mandate is to engage the Canadian public in the work of the United Nations and the critical international issues"

To that end, UNA uses UN staff "at the National Office and a network of volunteer-driven regional branches.", presumably students, to learn the UN perspective and to give voice to them [See more below] -- Is this indoctrination, perhaps even activism, before students are mature enough? Before learning other perspectives? Students become--activists?--members of committees such as:

* International Court of Justice -- The current president is from NB -- [that globalization / global governance perspective, again ]

* Council of Confederaton -- [ Why should 'confederation' concern the UN? ]

* NGO Network -- [Is it from this that 'student activists', 'protestors', and 'stakeholders' arise like the phoenix?]

* Arab League -- [There are many questions about that inclusion and the exclusion of other areas ]



* Model United Nations

* CANIMUN Sponsors -- a 'tournament' funded by Foreign Affairs (DFAIT, Min. Bill Graham), Dept. of Canadian Heritage (Min. Lisa Frulla) and National Defence (Min. Bill Graham )

Canada's Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade (DFAIT) has been supporting the United Nations Association in Canada's Model United Nations Programme. . . . the United Nations Association in Canada (UNA-Canada) . . . an international Model UN Conference in Canada for Canadian and international university students.


The United Nations Association in Canada (UNA-Canada) is a national charitable organization . . . [whose] mandate is to engage the Canadian public in the work of the United Nations and the critical international issues . . . . accomplish our goals through a dynamic staff team at the National Office and a network of volunteer-driven regional branches.

. . . . .We work closely with [indoctrinate?] the educational communities in every province and territory to build their capacity to educate young people from a global perspective. . . . .

UNA-Canada's projects also aim to define foreign policy priorities for our government. . . . with a variety of stakeholders . . . peace and security, human rights and sustainable development. . . . Canada's international priorities, and a range of global issues. . . . .


At that point, I realized that all that interest in and activity with students has a very political intent and perspective, Would we--should we--term it social engineering by our government? (See #7 for an exploration of this. ) Another example, check:

ECOSOC and Summits -- Do you recognize any of Paul Martin's buzzwords from this list? Any of his 'priorities'?

World Trade Organization (WTO)
Topic 1: Role of the L20 in Trade Negotiations
Topic 2: Review of the Doha Development Agenda

United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF)
Topic 1: Child Soldiers
Topic 2: Child Trafficking and Sexual Exploitation
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)
Topic 1: Climate Change
Topic 2: Biodiversity and GMO's
United Nations Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO)
Futuristic Committee
2050: World food supply and production capacity have drastically depleted
United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS

Topic 1: Building an Intersectional Model
Topic 2: HIV/AIDS, Security, and Humanitarian Response
United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO)
Topic 1: Preserving Indigenous, Non-Official, or Second Languages
Topic 2: Proposals for new World Heritage Sites



In Canada's Future: Is it Humanitarians Doing Good ... or Something Else?


Follow the Yellow--Red--Brick Road #5

This section will explore another government project--an academic project, possibly an academic job development and departmental expansion project--using tax money which benefits a few and which, in this case, may not help the natives, but will use the good-will of its participants.

Government projects and initiatives are topics which I have mentioned before on this site. This ties in with what was in post #4 of this series. I suppose one could call it The Government Wanting to Appear to do Good Series


Bear with me; I do have some points not made in my post Dec. 6, 05.

Is all that follows the sign of a caring government funding professionals to ameliorate a situation or . . . what? Is the emphasis placed in the most useful area and thus likely to be successful? Is it a subtle way of expanding more federal government control through creating a network that will live off this project . . . and more of a similar nature?


Is this a genuine desire to help the addicted, glue-sniffing children of addicted and ineffectual parents? Will this change that dysfunctional situation? Helping them by having them gain pride in their language, perhaps through "Linguistic Development of a Heritage Language: Innu-aimun" -- With the imprimatur of the UN? . . . Or are more long-laid plans coming to fruition? More expansion of that department which has been termed the Bill 101 for TROC (the rest of Canada), the area outside Quebec?

What would be more Prime Ministerial--more Paul Martin--than getting the backing of the UN for what the power people want to do anyway? It satisfies a few, but a powerful few. So, in my opinion, the PM leans on the UN, as it leans on him in pushing its agenda. I hypothesize that this aspect of the UN's influence in Canada has far-reaching import:


United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) Topic 1: Preserving Indigenous, Non-Official, or Second Languages


Consider the pressure to develop Canadians' sensitivity: sensitivity to immigrants and to native issues, for example, to develop curricula or dictionaries as a prelude to curricula in native languages--undoubtedly a prelude to even more costly and ultimately, programs that separate Canadians--even though Canada's immigrants who succeed must learn one of the two official languages--and do--accomplishing their entrance to mainstream modern society rapidly in the process.

Why is Canada's government so intent on promoting languages which will not help natives leave their dismal lives to live in the real world, but which will give work for academics and language program(s) development? Consider the number of heritage languages that could be developed across Canada, and the expansion of the Department's reach, the expansion of need for more sub departments or branches to handle the other linguistic developments.

The next section will deal with the the initiative in the Newfoundland-Labrador area and in particular with the Sheshatshiu Innu and Natuashish, the Institut Culturel et Éucatif Montagnais in Quebec. Would any of this be under the aegis of Canada's Language Czar / Tzar Dyane Adam's department? Or is it the Department of Heritage? The term "heritage languages" will give a hint. The UN supports Heritage languages.

Did Dyane Adam, China, and business, at least to a degree, have anything to do with this Heritage Languages initiative? The cynic in me asks since alcohol and drug dependency would seem to be more pressing problems.



Digression -- but eventually, reason for its inclusion will be evident. The push for "heritage languages" will give a hint.

News Junkie Canada, Dec. 23, 04: "Lang Tzar-China" -- Scroll down to "Lang Tzar-China, Ecstasy-Busts, China-Workers, Libya-Plot-Saudi, UN-Saudi 'Activist'. RCMP-Counterfeit, BC Rail, FINTRAC, Sikhs-Threat, Fat Police"

http://
newsjunkiecanada.blogspot.com/
2004_12_23_newsjunkiecanada_archive.html

Commissioner of Official Languages, Dyane Adam: "Official's China trip includes a holiday" Kathleen Harris, Ottawa Bureau Toronto Sun, Dec. 22, 04 -- 4 days for biz, rest for fun -- Bad Optics, Dyane

http://
www.canoe.ca/NewsStand/TorontoSun/
News/2004/12/22/793233-sun.html


OFFICIAL LANGUAGES Commissioner Dyane Adam used a four-day government business trip to Beijing to tack on a three-week China vacation with her husband. Adam's senior adviser, whose spouse also tagged along on the Asian pre-conference holiday, brought the total taxpayers' tab to $13,657 for flights, accommodation, meals, registration fees and taxi fares. [. . . . ]

Adam's travel costs for the September conference on law and language were almost twice the amount billed by Auditor General Sheila Fraser for a trip to the same destination this summer. In July, the federal spending watchdog claimed $3,512 for her business trip to Beijing, which included a $1,942 economy ticket. [. . . . ]


When you consider what I predicted in that December 2004 post, it was almost precient, given events since.


My comments -- at the time, Dec. 2004:


Watch for this -- grand announcements during Prime Minister Paul Martin's trip to China -- new business deals with China involving oil, mining, or some other important Canadian assets -- and the businesses will require the use of French! .... The Chinese aren't stupid; they know who to court and what province runs the government. [Check the key ministries and who head foundations and crown corps. and other powerful groups, before dismissing this idea.]

[In Dec. 2004], think China-MinMetals' due diligence on buying Noranda-Falconbridge; the offer hasn't happened [at that time], but the door has not been closed....China needs metals. Think Stelco. Think China's recently announced desire to buy Husky Oil, Li Ka-Shing's company. Note that Newfoundland-Labrador [had not then] not been able to budge the PM [until he desperately needed to win last year's election] on their share of the offshore oil revenue money. Do you know what companies are involved in searching for oil in the area? Check a little. Of course, there is the North. Think of the fast tracking of land claims settlements with the Natives in the North and murmurs about circumventing the need to go before Parliament, perhaps. Think the desire to develop the North, the diamonds, et cetera . . . . and it goes on.

Canadians shop for Christmas. The ones who stand to make money have other plans.

Watch for the big announcements.




The busy Christmas season has come around again for 2005. Watch for developments ... any that have not already taken place ... and are just waiting for Canadians to crown this PM again.

Why do you think Paul Martin is displaying such desperation to remain in office? He will spend any amount of Canadians' tax and windfall profits tax money to remain in office. Follow the yellow--red--brick road.




Follow the Yellow--Red--Brick Road #6

Linguistic Development of a Heritage Language: Innu-aimun

Memorial's Department of Linguistics and Faculty of Education, working in partnership with Labrador Innu communities, are developing tools that will aid in the enhancement of literacy of the Innu in their own language, Innu-aimun.

The primary endeavour of the group will be to develop a comprehensive tri-lingual (Innu-aimun, English, French) dictionary. The research team, led by Dr. Marguerite MacKenzie, head of Memorial's Department of Linguistics, was awarded a Community-University Research Alliances (CURA) grant of $996,992 over five years from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) for the project Knowledge and Human Resources for Innu Language Development.

[Note, in the face of a native area's incredible dysfunction:

"The primary endeavour of the group will be to develop a comprehensive tri-lingual (Innu-aimun, English, French) dictionary." ]


"With my co-investigators Barbara Burnaby, Faculty of Education, Philip Branigan, Linguistics, and Marie-Odile Junker, Carleton University, we will be developing tools for promoting literacy in the Innu language . . . . "The first year or two of the project will focus on building on the existing Montagnais-French dictionary compiled by Quebec linguist Lynn Drapeau, adding English translations and Labrador words, so that it can then form the basis of creating and revising literacy documents such as readers, classroom materials and other teaching aids using a common spelling system." . . . .

"We are also aiming to sensitize English and French speakers to the complexities of Innu-aimun. . . . ."


Another part of the project includes the creation of a Web site that will serve as an archive of information about the Innu language, including texts written in Innu, bibliographies, student theses and, eventually, the dictionary. [Check, but I believe this is for natives who had no WRITTEN language nor books. ]

The group will be partnering with the teacher training programs and other training programs in the community . . . .

"For aboriginal people in Labrador to take advantage of economic opportunities like Voisey's Bay they have to have a minimum level of ability to function in English." [The Innu French dictionary is being prepared first. See another article on FHTR on learning Inuktituk in Paris below.]...


Dr. MacKenzie and her team have been closely collaborating with the Sheshatshiu Innu Nation, the Innu Education Authority in Sheshatshiu and the Institut Culturel et Éucatif Montagnais in Quebec. "The research will be focused on establishing an ongoing relationship between organizations in the community and the university," explained Dr. MacKenzie.

"Groups such as Labrador Legal Services, the Newfoundland and Labrador Legal Aid Commission and the Sheshatshiu health and social services organizations on the one hand and faculty members from departments within Memorial on the other hand will establish teams to promote improved skills in Innu and English language in their specific domains. Thus, the results of research can be given back to the community so that members of the community can be trained to participate in research that is in their interest." [to alleviate the dysfunction? ]


"SSHRC's CURA program is designed to bring researchers and community groups together to work on issues of joint concern," said SSHRC President Marc Renaud.


Labrador school board, band councils, teachers, community leaders, federal Department of Native and Northern Affairs, and the Innu Nation. . . . creating and implementing a model to identify learner diversity, as well as creating avenues for long-term professional development to assist with capacity building . . . .

[. . . . ] There are endless research opportunities, and this could be the beginning of an interesting partnership . . . . sensitivity is required when dealing with preservation of language and culture.


More here



Note the following: Philpott Study: "plunged into an alien culture and language. . . . consultation with aboriginal educators and leaders to develop a culturally appropriate, language sensitive model . . . . at least 35 per cent of children . . . . fetal alcohol syndrome . . . . a dialogue among the stakeholders


Doesn't all that just warm the cockles of your heart -- to have contributed to such a development for the underachieving students--the glue-sniffing or otherwise addicted kids? Do you suppose they they might yet get to work at Voisey's Bay?

What is being done to address the alcoholism, the parental inability to parent because of addictions, children born with fetal alcohol syndrome, the drugs that have come into the North (besides the glue for sniffing and the alcohol) into Labrador?




Innu -- "They don’t want to see us get well. They make money from us.”

PARLIAMENT-HILL CHEAP February 09, 2005, John Lofranco

http://
www.maisonneuve.org/blog/
index.php?itemid=811

. . . hundreds of millions of tax dollars gone to waste. . . . the “healing strategy,” a government program to fix social problems in a Labrador Innu community. . . . move 700 Innu from Davis Inlet to the new, entirely government-built town of Natuashish, in an effort to stem rampant alcohol and drug abuse? Two years later, those problems still exist, and the massive government spending has produced few obvious results. Record keeping by the feds is so poor . . . not getting much of a return on the government’s investment: [. . . . ]

So where is the money going? The report noted that the band council was not immune to the community’s problems, showing evidence that Innu leaders were involved in the drug trade.



In whose interest would it be to appear to have a perhaps well-meaning group dialoguing with stakeholders, attempting to address a massive dysfunction with a a linguistic program, to be researching and preparing reports, dictionaries, curricula . . . sensitive . . . while in the background are those who would take advantage of dysfunctional peoples too addled and addicted to realize that they have just been given incredible powers over the resources in the lands they call home?

Oh, there was also a hurried land settlement by regulation--not via Parliament--involving the Minister, Andy Scott.

What do you think will happen? Who will benefit? Have you heard of immigration Minister Volpe's plans to bring in 40,000 immigrants? How many will be business immigrants with interest in oil and minerals?


I have mentioned plans on this site before. So many stakeholders to accommodate.

"The Canada of minorities is the Canada of tomorrow"

Our government, the helping professions and the long-term planners . . . working together . . . to improve lives . . . and the world . . .


FHTR June 29, 05
http://
frosthitstherhubarb.blogspot.com/
2005_06_26_frosthitstherhubarb_archive.html

Captain's Quarters, April 10, 2005 -- a speech by Serge Joyal

Take a look at these excerpts from a speech made by Trudeau's last Secretary of State. The speech was made in French to The Acadian Association of Nova Scotia on November 13, 1982. (This Association is funded to the amount of half-a-million dollars per year by you the Canadian taxpayer.) A copy of the speech which, was not printed in any English newspaper, was sent to me by one of the few members of Canada's Parliament who had any inkling of what was happening in Canada, or cared. The relevant excerpt fom Mr. Joyal's speech are as follows: [. . . . ]

"The Canada of minorities is the Canada of tomorrow." [. . . . ]


Do not miss reading the rest.



FHTR week of June 26, 2005

http://
frosthitstherhubarb.blogspot.com/
2005_06_26_frosthitstherhubarb_archive.html

The Canadian Geographic: Global Citizen edition, Nov./Dec. 2004
Education: Language of love
Why are there more students of Inuktitut in Paris than in Toronto, Montreal or Vancouver? Ask their teacher, a feisty Quebecer


by Michel Arseneault, 132

[Michele] Therrien learned Inuktitut in an odd way. When she first went to northern Quebec in 1969, Quebec's Ministry of Education was setting up schools to counter federal English-only institutions. The new provincial schools were eager to teach Inuit children in their own language, but there were no Inuktitut-speaking teachers around. So the Ministry recruited francophones, including the young Therrien, who ended up in the little town of Salluit on the northern Ungava coast. She taught all her lessons in French, and an interpreter translated every word. "I'm not sure that my pupils learned very much," she confesses. "But by hearing my own words repeated over and over again, I ended up learning Inuktitut." [. . . . ]

French President Jacques Chirac was the first head of state to visit Nunavut, barely five months after it was created in April 1999. [. . . . ]


Search: Institut National des Langues et Civilisation Orientales



I await "Canada's African aid: PM & Team's humanitarian series" to get into full swing. . . . Perhaps it has already . . . Search: Africa Workshop -- or here



Follow the Yellow--Red--Brick Road #7

Globalization and UN activism in Canada with Big Brother and the Enablers

"UNA-Canada's projects also aim to define foreign policy priorities for our government"


Quote from the United Nations Association in Canada. Is our government social engineering? Indoctrinating? Practicing thought control in the service of globalization and the UN? I believe so.

Our government's inordinate respect for the United Nations, about which so much chicanery has been revealed, raises my cynicism to the point where I read further. The Global TV news item (Dec. 6, 05 "Media Hatchet Job in the Maritimes") is partly responsible for my quest and, like Topsy, the quest for more information "just grew and grew".

I wondered for example, why the UN's Kofi Annan was invited--or did he ask--to speak to Canada's Parliament? Why was he accorded such respect when heads of state are not? When interference in our election makes the news at present and everyone criticizes any foreign involvement, why is our government honouring the views of an organization led by a man who ignores evil and terrorism, even when it is staring him in the face? Read Daniel Pipes' article on Kofi Annan's selective stupidity concerning the Palestinians' map which omits Israel; it is not on the map. Why do Annan and the UN not react to the Muslim states who state openly that they would obliterate Israel and Israelis? (National Post, Dec. 15, 05). Then I remembered Arafat's appearance with a gun at the UN. Note too that the Arab League is active through the UN in Canada. Our government is honouring all that? It boggles the mind. This government did not ask the rest of us.

I question the dictates of this self-serving body--not every country nor its representative--but the current movers and shakers of the UN, a body whose survival depends upon convincing enough member states that its influence and the good it does--such as it is--warrants not only its survival, but its expansion, its reach. It is this expansion of influence into into Canada with the Liberal government(s) complicity that I question.

UN expansion is achieved with a willing Paul Martin & Team through allowing and approving with funding, UN activism and influence over what are considered acceptable topics for discussion, along with delineating what are acceptable attitudes -- attitudes which, in effect, have placed some questions beyond debate altogether.

At the national level, a compliant-to-UN-speak Canadian government, using the UN to advance its own plans as well, has narrowed the range of debate in compliance with UN-speak. What follow are just a few examples:

* Consider the Kyoto accord: There has been one perspective on climate change that has dominated for years, compliments of taxpayer funding, with the likelihood of much more if the Paul Martin government is successful with its plans, the government-&-UN-approved position. Yet, there are other perspectives from scientiests who have not received the same wide publicity, not being the recipients of taxpayer largesse. Since government and the mainstream media are supportive of each other (in an enabling relationship, as Lorrie Goldstein might phrase it.), the non-government-approved and non-UN-approved science information has not been disseminated adequately enough to be included in the debate. See the example I posted on this website detailing how difficult, how impossible, it is to get a public hearing for your research if government is against it--if it goes against what Big Government wants to do.

FHTR: Week of May 8-13, 05 -- Kyoto: triggering government funding & "broadcast quality" -- Government information control is insidious.

http://
frosthitstherhubarb.blogspot.com/
2005_05_08_frosthitstherhubarb_archive.html

CFP: Kyoto Protocol--Propaganda or Censorship? -- How to keep information from being broadcast to Canadians if it contradicts the line the government is pushing by Garth Pritchard, Canadafreepress.com, Saturday, May 7, 2005

http://
canadafreepress.com/2005/cover050705.htm

Last Thursday, I received a telephone call from Douglas Leahey, Ph.D., representing a group of Canadian scientists under the umbrella of "Friends of Science." It seems that they had been talking to Peter Worthington of the Toronto Sun, and he had mentioned to them that they should get in touch with me.

[. . . . ] Then I found out what their documentary was about. The story was incredible: it documented scientists--from Canada--speaking out against the $10-billion scam known as the Kyoto Protocol.

Yes, the very same Kyoto Accord that our government has committed Canada and Canadians to support.

[. . . . ] The Canadian government created an entity known as Telefilm and the Canadian Television Fund--a $250-million slush fund of taxpayers’ dollars. A bureaucracy that in theory provides funds for the creation of Canadian programming. Hidden in this monolith are a few interesting rules: [. . . . ]



These scientists were so hamstrung by the rules that they could not get a film--that they, themselves, had paid to make--into the television media so the rest of us could see and hear for ourselves. This is engrossing and shows Big Brother in action. Do you ever wonder about the "news" that is "allowed" to be heard through the Liberal Propaganda Organs? Unbelievable government interference!


Nothing substantive came out of the Kyoto and climate change conference recently held in Montreal; it fact, other countries are re-thinking this slavish following of what the UN wants. (Think of UN pressure for Western guilt geld in the form of Kyoto pollution credits, credits which will facilitate economic and other expansion in countries such as Russia and China, particularly China, which will continue polluting using Canadian energy sources and minerals. All this will be achieved on the backs of businesses and Canadians' who will be paying; we will be penalizing our own businesses, while the worst polluters gain.)

* Consider what are termed women's issues. Some perspectives and some NGO's receive government funding; others do not. Compare the taxpayer funding given, along with government recognition of their views as acceptable--hence the chosen group gain a certain credibility (though government has lost enormous credibility ). Those holding accepted views become stakeholders. Consider these two organizations:

* Women's groups such as the National Action Committee on the Status of Women (NAC)--more in the past than recently, resolutely fought for women's rights, but not men's rights. In fact the whole movement has devalued men, sometimes denigrating the need for men and fathers in children's lives. Organizations like this successfully get special status, in effect, for women. NAC, non-denominational, particularly non-Christian, at least in regard to abortion and the legal position of the foetus, has been able, using taxpayer money, to publicize its views and has gained government approved status as a high-profile stakeholder.

* Compare their position with that of REALwomen unable--unacceptable?--to be an NGO to the UN conference on women's issues and family because it did not have government-approved views. REALwomen's views are from a Christian perspective, from what I can gather in reading. Caveat: I know too little about both organizations but I do hear enough to get an idea of the relative influence of each on government and the resultant publicity and taxpayer funding received. It is quite evident to which organization our government has listened. REALwomen has views that, I suspect, are more in tune with a large number of Canadian women, but they remain unrepresented at international symposia.


Non-elected NGO's with a government-approved perspective have had much more influence. Canadians have not voted to determine who will represent Canadians' views on the family internationally. Citizens have no vehicle to make their views known with the UN, for example, except through their government. Those who do not accept women's groups such as NAC as representing their views have had no means of input. Liberal governments have been elected to reign and then they chose. There is no debate, except outside government, and with lack of airing in mainstream media, the non-government views (e.g. pro-choice) have had little or no influence over government(s).

Public discussion is, effectively, over, about which perspective, and hence which NGO's, deserve funding, get to decide the agenda and to represent some Canadians' views internationally. The National Action Committee on the Status of Women perspective prevailed in Canada's input to the UN, though, heard from less and less, now that it has served its purpose for those with an agenda, in my opinion. Do Canadians have access to information about past funding? Who chose / chooses what views will prevail? That is one of those dark and murky areas of our (mostly Liberal) government(s), I suspect. (Check further. Also, I have read something lately about REALwomen having some rise in status as intervenors, but not officially as an NGO, but, again, check further.)

As for the message, defining women's "choice" has been the province of women who agree with the prevailing 'right to choose' viewpoint pushed by such as NAC; other views have been outside the realm of even being considered any more. 'Choice' now means not just a right to health and security of the person, a laudable goal, particularly in the world of women's being subject to the rule of men in the Muslim world, which runs a gamut from oppression to a degree of freedom from the dictates of men. Yet the health issuue as promoting security of the person and of a woman's free will has today become the right to abortion without limits in Canada.

There are other issues omitted from discussion:

* That women are the bearers of children, thus have responsibilities transcending the self

* That women have responsibilities to that foetus / child, to the father of that child, and to the child to see that the bond with the father is not broken

* Whether the foetus is considered a person from conception, or some time after that

* Whether the foetus deserves to be protected by legal rights, as well

* That a parent has responsibilities to a child but also to a community, particularly since today society pays for the care of those who bear children and have insufficient income, for whatever reason, to care for them

* How much input those who pay may have -- for example, in the case of alcoholics or drug addicted women who become mothers again and again

These issues have not been aired adequately; they have not been part of the official debate
, and, as Kim Campbell put it, an election is no time for reasoned debate (roughly remembered). What she should have added is that our media are listening for the sound bite, the wounding shiv, anything but reasoned debating points. Logical arguments do not make the news; media wouldn't want to interfere with people's watching the mindless TV drivel which supports the media and the mindless shopping. Hence the non-debate about Canada's lack of abortion law and our government's leader and team huffing and puffing over women's sacred bodies . . . and votes.

At the time of the push for women's issues, came the perfect poster boy for men's violence against women which fit in well with the anti-male bias of the last ten to fifteen years, if there were success in hiding its origins, the influence of a father and the fanatacism that entered Canada with him from Algeria, along with his Muslim, sharia-inspired despicable treatment of women.

Into the breech, the need for women to rise on the backs of those they could denigrate, came Gamil Gharbi / Marc Lepine. His atrocity became an excuse to paint men in general as violent against women, and there was the subsequent tilt by the courts toward women, for example, in the treatment of men as fathers. Yet fathers have rights which affect their children if ignored or belittled. Compared with the treatment of women in divorce, there has arisen an imbalance in the courts' treatment of men in divorce and child custody issues.

There has been a concomitant and not-too-subtle acceptance in the advertising world of men's second-rate status. All this has risen in parallel to a quest for 'equal status' for women--women as judges, as MP's--in all areas that government could influence. It has come to mean not equality, but preference. Enough. Let merit be the guide.

There is too much concerning women's issues which has moved outside the realm of public debate, yet the subjects need reasoned discussion by all, not just with government-approved groups.

Too much power has been arrogated to those with the government-approved perspective, in this, and in other areas. At whose instigation? Who approved use of Canadians' tax dollars for one view, but not another? Have we in Canada moved beyond debate, particularly if it diverges from the government-approved position? Has the debate over the foetus, like the one over Kyoto agreements, been settled by those whose ideas have prevailed, those who see choice as the right to abortion with no limits--that a perspective which includes the (generally Christian) concern for the foetus as having rights, for example, is no longer even to be discussed? That it is settled? Those who disagree have not even had the democratic right to a referendum on this contentious issue. The playing field has been gerrymandered by a government which agrees with the NGO's pushing women's choice--by the ones who want no control over abortion at all. That is how to get funding and publicity and why an NGO (NGO's?) represents Canadian women at international and UN conferences on women's issues. It just happens to be the view of Maurice Strong, our Prime Minister's mentor, as well.

It is fair here to state my own biases. I do believe that Canadians who pay should have input, not just those who agree with the government.

As for abortion, my mind has run the gamut of views--from what anyone feels when hearing of rape's progeny or a child of 13 or 14 pregnant, to being utterly appalled at descriptions of partial birth abortion. I believe that society and humanity do have an interest in the unborn child, that the result of a night of abandon, a fling, stupidity, naivete--or whatever--is not solely the province of the woman, either to keep or to abort. Society has been paying, and will be, for the offspring of those who do not think or plan ahead so society deserves too, to have some input into if and where it will draw the line, to be discussed openly. The issue encompasses more than the idea that the woman's womb is hers to do as she wishes.

The more I learn, the more I see that complete freedom of choice in this, as in other areas, is not an unmitigated positive, that the societal and personal costs may be too high, but we are not discussing this at all. Society has a right to at least discuss what values contribute to the long-term health of society. I do not know how to solve the dilemma, but refusing to discuss it is ridiculous, since society will pay, whether for the children born, for the abortion or for the single mother*, for the mental health problems that may ensue whatever the decision, and more. No woman is an island, either. (* Fathers seem to be missing too often, though women's freedom to hook up might be impeded if we discussed why. It might open a can of worms, might it not? )

When government(s) refuse to allow civilized debate, democracy is finished. More and more that has become PM & Co's Big Government way, in Parliament and in all spheres. Governments coerce behind the scenes, use a compliant media to get out a one-sided message, and effectively forbid differences to be expressed and explored before a vote which is controlled at the behest of a PM/PMO. Most of us can live with the results of a free vote; we can no longer afford Big Brother's control.

Why I support the inclusion to the debate of groups with which I might not even agree:


I believe that one does not even necessarily have to agree with everything REALwomen stands for to believe that it has a right to make its point publicly, without being denigrated and treated disdainfully, as I have heard mainstream media members do, if they mention REALwomen at all. MSM have ignored their views and those they represent . . . or the group has been treated as old-fashioned, out of step with the times, not deserving of the media elites' respectful hearing. That is wrong.

Too often the government and media are in concert as to what warrants nothing more than an amused or disdainful glance before ignoring the arguments altogether.

The media have been ignoring some news and become a pro-government cheering team for other news. Besides what I have mentioned, the media have been complicit with government in their treatment of the US, with their negative attitude to the US Republican President and government, but relatively positive in their treatment of the visit to Montreal by the PM-Propping Billy, the I-did-not-have-sex-with-that-woman Democrat, William Jefferson Clinton. Media glee at the photo-op was that of supporters for PM & Team.

I join others in preferring presidents whose attention is focused on the job, for example, the chance of capturing Osama before 9/11 occurred, which Bill let slip by. (Perhaps the chance which he was offered, detailed on FHTR, occurred when he was distracted by other 'service'.) I rather cotton to leaders who realize that the Oval Office is not the place for sexual dalliances, if one does not want to risk putting the office of President, itself, into disrepute. Bill failed on both counts; he is hardly a poster boy for PM & Team, if they had thought about it at all -- or did Bill's charisma win out again?

What must change in Canada is the disenfranchisement--the exclusion from discussion--of the views of Canadians whose positions differ from those of the current government, the mainstream media located in Canada's centre, and those who live off the work and taxes of others. . . all those--erroneously--known as 'elites'. Government funding and perquisites do not an 'elite' make.

While I have considered Kyoto and women's issues as incomplete explorations of societal concerns, as well as mainstream media and government's complicity in narrowing debate, it is the UN's influence in all this in Canada that presently concerns me. With this perspective in mind, look again at the list of UN committees operating in Canada, influencing students and others' minds, with the help of our government and Canadians' taxes.

Canadians do not pay taxes for indoctrination nor for control on the part of Big Brother -- not for their pre-schoolers nor for their university students, nor for the citizenry who are neither. It isn't just the West that wants in; we all want in.



Nov 29, 2005

NJC Aug. 25, 2004 Security, Immigration, Terrorists, SCOC, Book:Cold Terror

Reposting with links added: three lists and links are bold


http://
newsjunkiecanada.blog
spot.com/2004_08_25_newsjunkie
canada_archive.html





"It took three days for Canada's national police force to be told that a suspicious shipping container was missing from a Halifax pier last spring."

Port of Halifax: Container spirited away with a CRANE but RCMP not notified for THREE DAYS


See below for that post. NJC





News Junkie Canada August 25, 2004


August 25, 2004


Another Compilation for Aug. 25, 04

I know, I know. I said I was taking a break -- and then I read some more. Each time, I think, "But this is important!" This time, I am going to relax -- really. The most loved little godchild in the world is coming -- and what else is important? If only all children could be born into such loving homes with extended families who think they're perfect!

List of Articles:

* Who's protecting investors? -- Nortel, Bre-X, Livent — where are our Googles?

* Auditing the auditors: Report cards coming -- Public overseer assesses top firms Wave of problems sparked review -- "We will not be naming particular sins in particular firms . . ." -- Who's protecting investors? Everybody else seems to be protected

* More Corruption? Someone will pay for the toxic mould on native reserves--but who? -- "Dr. Hari Vijay, a mould specialist with Health Canada, set up a field laboratory on the reserve in 2002 and collected blood samples from the population to determine if there were antibodies in the blood as the result of living in mouldy conditions. Before she was finished, her work was abruptly suspended"

* Where's the 'faint hope' for victims? -- if the police cannot get justice for one of their own

* Different codes for different folks -- Jonas on sharia in Canada

* Justice in the Islamic Republic -- Here’s a story about the glory of shari’a.

* MPs return eyeing re-election -- Resentment in Liberal ranks -- Does Quebec MP Helene Chalifour-Scherrer's elevation to the PMO mean she will get to take the Bombardier Challenger jet again?

* Censoring the Bible -- religious freedom and freedom of expression vs gay rights -- Predict which will win in Canada -- The two nominees for the SCOC are pro gay rights.

* The Olympics: three links

* Women are ruining the Olympics

* The Muslim Olympics

* CENSORING THE OLYMPICS






You might have to be from the Maritimes to get a chuckle from this.

How to say "I love you"

English - I love you
French - Je t'aime
Italian - Ti amo
Chinese - Wo ai nin
Newfoundland - Nice arse; now get in the truck.


Thanks G***.


Who's protecting investors? -- Nortel, Bre-X, Livent — where are our Googles?

The wheels of justice grind very slowly in Canada. They're charged, prosecuted and convicted in the US in about half the time it takes them to get going here, if they get going at all. Now, we have fewer experienced RCMP officers and prosecutors. It's an old story. Who benefits? Read a few of the following posts for an idea.

Nortel, Bre-X, Livent — where are our Googles?

http://
www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/Content
Server?pagename=thestar/Layout/
Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=109312
6209119&call_pageid=968332188
492&col=968793972154


Aug. 22, 2004, Jennifer Wells

So Google Inc. is officially a publicly traded company and Nortel Networks Corp. remains mired in a pongy-smelly swamp.

Is there symmetry here?

Just look. There were plentiful pictures the other day of Google executives launching their stock with triumphant yahoo sorts of looks on their faces. And there were plentiful inches of ink spilled on that latest bad news from Nortel — more executives fired "for cause"; continued opacity around the company's financial performance.

And I'm thinking: Are the Canadian markets caught in a time warp or what?

[. . . . ] Up here, the Canadian Public Accountability Board, whose job it is to ensure public confidence in the integrity of financial statements, says it will release its first report on the country's top accounting firms next month. The board has cautioned that it won't name names, but instead will highlight problem areas in the financial statements of publicly traded companies.

When the board eventually itemizes improper recognition of revenues, or revenue shell games, how surprised will we be? Not very.

Scratch that. Not at all.

And the board appears to be quite concerned that, whatever they say, the country's big accounting firms may get mad at them. Poor baby. [. . . . ]


Wells must realize that there is an "elite" with a network of enablers from the courts to the media to NGO's to those who "live off the avails of" what that "elite" make available to those who go with the flow, that is, those who run things and who have enough power to ruin any person or business which might interfere with "the system", the way things are and have always been done.

If you don't believe this, try to remember the scandals which should have brought down any government, except Canada's. With the media, money and the complicity of the backroom boys of the old Tory party, Canadians were bombarded with a stream of fear-inducing ads, directives on how to vote from the provincial backroom old boys (particularly, it has been reported, in that land of transfer payments and other largesse from TROC with which Maritime votes are bought) who support the leftist agenda, and more. It worked!

Then consider that in the US there is a right and a left-wing body of thought and opinion debated and reported. How much does this happen in Canada? The consequence for us is that the most egregious examples of chicanery are allowed--even not reported--when the perpetrators are part of that network of Canada's "elites" or their supporters. Think of how much ridicule has been heaped on the Byfields, whose civic mindedness and evident decency should be lauded, largely because they question the way things are and have always been. Think of Preston Manning. Think of the scorn heaped upon the independent and innovative Albertans. To adopt some of their ideas might open a Pandora's box and Canadians might demand more -- accountability, transparency -- even democracy.


Auditing the auditors: Report cards coming -- Public overseer assesses top firms Wave of problems sparked review -- "We will not be naming particular sins in particular firms . . ." -- Who's protecting investors? Everybody else seems to be protected.

Auditing the auditors: Report cards coming -- Public overseer assesses top firms Wave of problems sparked review
Aug. 19, 2004, John Spears

http://
www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/Content
Server?pagename=thestar/Layout/
Article_Type1&call_pageid=9713
58637177&c=Article&cid=1092867011111


Canadian shareholders who are shaken by recent warnings from public companies that their audited statements aren't quite as they seem will get a report card soon on just how well some of Canada's biggest auditors do their job.

The Canadian Public Accountability Board will be issuing its first report next month assessing the performance of Canada's four biggest auditing firms, David Scott, the board's chief executive, said in an interview.

"We will not be naming particular sins in particular firms, but we'll say in general: Here's the sorts of things that we have found," he said.


Re-read that last paragraph and then ask "Why not?" If some local kid robbed the corner store, his name would be in the newspapers. If you're big enough and important enough to be one of "Canada's four biggest auditing firms" which probably means you do work for the big boys, the government, the "elites", there is another standard? No! Is it possible? See my comments above.

[. . . . ] Auditors of public companies are in touch regularly with management through the year, and differences of opinion are often ironed out, Scott said.

If they can't be resolved, the auditor can bring the issue to the audit committee, which is made up of directors who are independent of management.

If the auditor is still unhappy, he or she can tell the company that the audit opinion will be "qualified," with the auditor explaining why he or she isn't happy with the statements.

"If you ask any auditor who's been around for a while in an opinion signing capacity, he'll probably have had to threaten qualification at one time or another," Scott said.

"It does go on, I can assure you. I personally have had to threaten qualification on more than one occasion to get a large company to make a change in its financial statements." [. . . . ]



More Corruption? Someone will pay for the toxic mould on native reserves--but who? -- "Dr. Hari Vijay, a mould specialist with Health Canada, set up a field laboratory on the reserve in 2002 and collected blood samples from the population to determine if there were antibodies in the blood as the result of living in mouldy conditions. Before she was finished, her work was abruptly suspended"

Someone will pay for the toxic mould on native reserves--but who? 2 August 2004, Candis McLean

http://
www.westernstandard.ca/website/
index.cfm?page=article&article_id=205


This is an example of what I had in mind above; whether there was corruption in this case or not, corruption that can be proven in a court of law, instinctively, we know how the system works. The government body that handles contracts of this nature awards the business to its friends and supporters, short-cuts are taken, the contractor(s) take the money and run (to be fair, not all do, I'm sure), and the rest of us, whether on reserve or elsewhere, are left with the results. There is a complicity involved, I believe. For example, think about the Health Canada whistleblowers who have lost their jobs lately. Then think of the whistleblower legislation which was designed so as to protect government, not the whistleblower. Check my archives.

Why was the study suspended? Who would order the suspension and why? To whose benefit? Do you think Canadian taxpayers will ever learn the whole story? What do you think will happen with Dr. Hari Vijay, mould specialist with Health Canada -- if she embarrasses the department(s) or minister(s) involved? If not eased out of her job, there are other ways of ruining her career. Bureaucrats are practiced at delivering what government wants -- even if it has to be--what would one call it--manufactured over time--the poor perfomance rating, the . . . well, you fill in the rest. The symbiosis is such that orders don't even have to be given and I suspect that bureaucrats do not actually realize what they are doing; they simply start to look more critically and negatively at the individual's work. Few of us could withstand excessive scrutiny of our work; there are always negatives which may be emphasized. And so, reflexively, the process is put in place if the minister involved would be negatively affected -- and so government work and awarding of contracts goes on in the usual manner.

An Ontario native band’s recent quarter-billion dollar class action lawsuit against the federal government may be the first of many across the country. It alleges that Ottawa failed to take reasonable measures to protect Ojibwa band members from the ravages of toxic mould in their houses [. . . . ]

Dr. Hari Vijay, a mould specialist with Health Canada, set up a field laboratory on the reserve in 2002 and collected blood samples from the population to determine if there were antibodies in the blood as the result of living in mouldy conditions. Before she was finished, her work was abruptly suspended. Vijay’s Ottawa laboratory was forced to release the collected blood samples. Band members say no explanations have been forthcoming as to why. When contacted by the Western Standard, Health Canada officials declined comment, due to the fact that the lawsuit over the mishandled sample is before the courts. No defense has been filed and the allegations are not proven.

Confidential documents obtained by the Western Standard indicate that an elders’ committee had been established in 1995 to address the “retrogression in living standards and evidence of corruption in the administration of band finances.”

[. . . .] A member of the emergency crew who spoke on condition of anonymity said the slimy growths had actually been noticed in 1995. “The band called in the contractor and he was mad. He had us just stipple over the green stuff in the ceilings and take the drywall off the walls and put new drywall up. We could see it was all black behind there, but we didn’t know what it was, or that it would grow right back through the new wall.” [. . . . ]


Again, I recommend checking these sites for information glossed over or even omitted from the mainstream press. (How I miss the "Alberta Report"!)

Western Standard
The Shotgun
Canada Free Press
Andrew Coyne
Colby Cosh
Citizens Centre

I have forgotten some, I am sure, but these are worth checking.


Where's the 'faint hope' for victims? -- if the police cannot get justice for one of their own

Where's the 'faint hope' for victims?

http://
www.canoe.ca/NewsStand/
TorontoSun/Editorial/home.html


August 22, 2004

WHEN EVEN the police, who are an integral part of Canada's justice system, complain they can't get justice for their own fallen comrades, it makes us wonder, what hope is there for ordinary crime victims?

Last week's eye-opening articles by the Sun's Alan Cairns on the antics of two cop-killers who have made a mockery of our parole system raise serious questions, for cops and civilians alike.

They also make us wonder how many more Jamie Munros and Jeffrey Breeses are out there.

Jamie Munro and his brother Craig were responsible for one of Toronto's most horrific police murders: Armed and masked, they shot and held hostage Const. Michael Sweet and let him bleed to death as he begged for his life. Craig was convicted of first-degree murder, but Jamie escaped with a second-degree conviction, sentenced in 1982 to "life" in prison with no parole for a minimum of 12 years.

[. . . . ] When people who commit the worst imaginable crimes are given the toughest possible sentences under our law, we expect those sentences to be enforced. We expect a "life" sentence to mean life -- not a life of travel back and forth to Europe; not special privileges to spend time with loved ones (a privilege these killers denied their victims forever).

We applaud the CPPA for making this issue a priority -- and for planning to confront Deputy PM Anne McLellan with it when she addresses them this Friday.

We hope they give her hell. After all, if the feds won't listen to front-line cops when they tell them the system is broken, what hope is there for the rest of us? [. . . . ]



Different codes for different folks -- Jonas on sharia in Canada

http://
www.canada.com/national/
nationalpost/news/story.html?id=99
643f25-f32e-4739-9d28-e73cbe13c3b0


George Jonas, National Post, August 23, 2004

Jonas writes of a delightful character, of earned respect and lack of coercion -- and then he comes to the imposition of sharia.

[. . . . ] The problem begins when proponents of sharia want to elevate an informal agreement among potential litigants into a formal part of Canada's (or at least Ontario's) legal system. They hope to achieve this -- Mr. Ali suggests they already have -- through the Arbitration Act of 1991, a piece of legislation born of Ontario's brief affair with the NDP, which provides for individuals to voluntarily opt in to "alternate dispute resolution." ADF is a streamlined process, with reduced procedural and evidentiary safeguards, whose results are enforceable by the courts. Once you opt in, you can't opt out, apparently; if you select the cheaper and faster track of ADF to resolve your dispute, you're stuck with it. So, if sharia becomes part of ADF, you're stuck with sharia, like it or not.

Here's the rub. Letting disputants turn with their tales of woe to a rabbi, a mullah, a short-order cook or even a Mafioso, instead of a judge, isn't dangerous. It only affirms that Canada is a free country. But extending formal recognition to tribal or religious laws and procedures is dangerous. It suggests that Canada isn't a country. At best, introducing parallel systems of justice fosters the fragmentation of society. At worst, it raises the spectre of theocracy encroaching on the secular state.

[. . . . ] As Barbara Amiel put it in the London Sunday Times yesterday: "Though many communities have used informal conflict resolution through their own tribal and religious arbitrators, only Muslims have sought to formalize such a parallel legal system. It is also noteworthy that only ultra-liberal governments, such as Ontario's, have considered acceding to such demands."


Women will be delighted with this! Now, read on for an example of life under sharia in Iran.


Justice in the Islamic Republic -- Here’s a story about the glory of shari’a.

http://littlegreenfootballs.com/
weblog/?entry=12272_Justice_in_the_Islamic_Republic


An Iranian named Mahmoud had an unfaithful wife.

He had her arrested and put on trial for her crime.

Mahmoud worried.

He worried that she might get away with it. His honor was at stake.

So he stabbed his unfaithful wife to death. In the courtroom.

Since Mahmoud was the sole support of his now somewhat diminished family, and his slaughtered, unfaithful wife had no surviving family members on her side to demand vengeance, Mahmoud was allowed to go free.

TEHRAN, Aug 19 (AFP) - Iran’s judiciary ordered a man to be released after he killed his unfaithful wife in the courtroom, because the woman’s immediate forebears are not alive to claim retaliation, press reports said Thursday. [. . . . ]


There is more, along with comments.

Comments #26

http://littlegreenfootballs.com/
weblog/?entry=12272#c0026


I want a bumpersticker that says

QUESTION "DIVERSITY"



MPs return eyeing re-election -- Resentment in Liberal ranks -- Does Quebec MP Helene Chalifour-Scherrer's elevation to the PMO mean she will get to take the Bombardier Challenger jet again?

She flew to Banff to politick pre-election -- then lost -- and now, she has "won" again. This is another example of how the game is played -- how you can win even if you lose -- as long as you have the right network of friends.

MPs return eyeing re-election -- Resentment in Liberal ranks

http://www.canada.com/national/
nationalpost/news/story.html?id=84e5
9a03-c60b-4ef2-adff-e90938550130


Anne Dawson, Chief Political Correspondent, CanWest, August 23, 2004

Some MPs also talk privately about their dissatisfaction with the Prime Minister's choice of Cabinet ministers to carry out the government agenda and their fear that Mr. Martin's staff is continuing its pre-election record of chaos, poor communications and refusal to listen to caucus concerns.

[. . . . ] "They've brought in a bunch of political operatives," said the MP referring to newly appointed deputy chief of staff Karl Littler, who was best known for his organization of Mr. Martin's leadership campaign and the Liberals' Ontario election campaign, and defeated Quebec MP Helene Chalifour-Scherrer, who co-chaired the election campaign.

Many say Ms. Chalifour-Scherrer, a long-time Martin loyalist who was appointed principal secretary in the PMO, is too inexperienced and got the job only because two years ago she was the first MP to publicly call for former prime minister Jean Chretien to quit to make way for Mr. Martin.

"It's all about politics and organization for the next election in the PMO. If they were interested in governing, they would have brought in people with a policy background."



Censoring the Bible -- religious freedom and freedom of expression vs gay rights -- Predict which will win in Canada -- The two nominees for the SCOC are pro gay rights.

Censoring the Bible

http://www.canada.com/national/
nationalpost/news/story.html?id=16d4
6758-ba05-4129-b627-8e62482120e8


National Post, August 23, 2004

In Canada, as in most Western nations, laws prohibiting the wilful incitement to hatred receive strong approval from the general public. Indeed, they are widely seen as a legal codification of our tolerant creed. But a recent Swedish case serves as a timely reminder of the perverse consequences that such laws can produce.

Earlier this summer, a Swedish court invoked that country's hate-speech law to sentence a Pentecostal pastor to one month in prison for preaching a vociferous sermon against homosexuality. The pastor, Ake Green, had labelled homosexuals "perverts whose sexual drive the Devil has used as his strongest weapon against God."

In making his case against the pastor, the public prosecutor explained: "One may have whatever religion one wishes, but [the sermon] is an attack on all fronts against homosexuals. Collecting Bible [verses] on this topic as he does makes this hate speech."

What about the pastor's religious freedom -- not to mention his freedom of speech? For the Swedish court, these considerations were trumped by gay rights. The rock-paper-scissors thinking behind the decision is best summarized by Soren Anderson -- president of a Swedish lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender rights foundation -- who told journalists religious freedom can never provide justification to offend people.

While Mr. Green's prosecution may be unusual, and his religious views extreme, his case highlights a broader conflict already beginning to play out in this country. In 2002, a federal court in Saskatchewan effectively equated Bible passages condemning homosexuality with hate literature.

[. . . . ] The Swedish prosecution should serve as a warning to Canada and other Western nations. While efforts to expand hate-speech censorship are undoubtedly well-meaning, they serve to unduly curtail freedoms of conscience that have formed the centuries-old bedrock of Western societies.



The Olympics

Women are ruining the Olympics [This site is now defunct; there had been an error in the link also.]

http://angry_lobo.blogspot.com/
2004/08/women-are-ruining-olympics.html

which leads to CENSORING THE OLYMPICS

http://www.benadorassociates.com/
article/6578


Amir Taheri who is always worth reading.


Free Speech, Indymedia Style

Free Speech, Indymedia Style

http://littlegreenfootballs.com/
weblog/?entry=12263_Free_Speech_Indymedia_Style


In a topic containing the stolen email addresses of many Protest Warrior mailing list subscribers, a Nazimedia Morlock threatens web attacks against LGF and Instapundit:

Re: Phone numbers, addresses, and e-mails of over 1600 RNC delegates!

by DownWithRNC
(No verified email address)
Current rating: 0
22 Aug 2004

TIME TO SHUT DOWN LGF, INSTAFASCIST AND THE REST...BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY.

THE DIGITAL BROWNSHIRTS WILL BE STOPPED.

ENJOY YOUR LAST NIGHT OF SAFETY GLEN, CHARLES AND THE REST...TICK, TOCK, THE END IS NEAR FOR YOU FASCISTS.


I’ve alerted everyone possible about this threat, accompanied as it is by the revelation of hundreds of private email addresses. [. . . . ]


Hard to believe, isn't it? Link and read the comments. Actually, link and read everything you have time to read.




# posted by News Junkie Canada at 10:02 AM





Two Compilations Aug. 24-25, 04

Note: This is not the end of all that I wish I had time to post; I hope to have time later. My thanks to the people who lead me to this information. I do appreciate it; it is just that keeping my life on track sometimes interferes.

There are two compilations below.

Added Aug. 25, 04:


* Abella and Charron "appointees" to SCOC -- "The panel is strictly advisory and will issue a non-binding report. A more permanent system of vetting nominees will be devised AFTER the next two judges are appointed. " [my emphasis] -- so it appears to be a done deal -- so much for . . . -- Andrew Coyne comments.

* Ottawa to review security -- And what about hiring the 3500 RCMP and CSIS officers to protect the rest of us Canadians?

* Missing Container Update

* Airport security scandal exposed -- UK -- but do you believe it is much better in our "kinder, gentler" Canada?

* Vancouver Island Grow-op -- Strong indications of a sophisticated organization with access to both money and manpower

* Bus travel: Toronto man caught at border with 3 guns -- Hands over loaded weapons peacefully

* Beat cops showing the flag

* Arson destroys two homes and a boat

* "Canada has nothing to be ashamed of when it comes to Olympic performances." -- Keep Olympians off further dole -- Other policies needed to support athletes

* Former Liberian leader sold conflict diamonds to al-Qaeda -- report





Abella and Charron "appointees" to SCOC -- "The panel is strictly advisory and will issue a non-binding report. A more permanent system of vetting nominees will be devised AFTER the next two judges are appointed. " [my emphasis] -- so it appears to be a done deal -- so much for . . .

2 women nominated to Supreme Court

http://
www.canada.com/ottawa/ottawacitizen/
news/story.html?id=39c585ba-31
6f-48c8-a50e-dfd19fedb4c1


Canadian Press, August 24, 2004

OTTAWA -- Justice Minister Irwin Cotler nominated two women Tuesday to fill Supreme Court vacancies.

Justice Rosalie Abella, a human rights expert, and Justice Louise Charron, a francophone Ontarian raised in Ottawa, will be vetted in a new parliamentary screening process to start Wednesday.

[. . . . ] The Conservatives have long been pushing for parliamentary hearings similar to the congressional grilling prospective Supreme Court judges get in the United States.

But the mechanism to be used this week is a far cry from those politically charged proceedings.

Cotler is expected to field questions about the candidates from a panel of MPs and legal experts. The panel is strictly advisory and will issue a non-binding report.


Note that the justices, themselves, do not have to respond to any queries. We would not want to cause any discomfort to our future Supremes by questioning their philosophical stances or other relevant matters -- nor, of course, would we want to politicize their "appointments". Ah, the horsefeathers by which we are governed -- or is that led around like donkeys?

A more permanent system of vetting nominees will be devised after the next two judges are appointed. [my emphasis]


One justice is 53, the other, 58 and they remain Supremes until age 75 -- so a new system won't matter to us, will it. It will be too late. The damage will have been done. A typical governing party promise made for election, then broken.

In this morning's National Post article, A purely political choice

http://
www.canada.com/national/nationalpost/news/
story.html?id=fcccf231-1c
61-4dcb-b72f-59705a2458d8


Andrew Coyne gives some background information on Justice Abella. Conservatives will not be amused.

[. . . . ] But ideology until now has been more or less taken for granted: It was expected that any appointee would subscribe to the approved pieties and the expansive view of the state's role that has come to dominate the law schools and the courts in recent decades. The vetting process was to screen for any outriders who might threaten the liberal consensus.

But this is the first time I can recall that a judicial appointment has been used as a political weapon, in the most partisan sense of the word. Ms. Abella is so far out of the mainstream, even among liberal jurists, that her appointment can only be seen as a deliberate provocation. Even allowing for the inability of certain Liberals to conceive that their views might in fact be controversial -- for that presumes the existence of differences of opinion -- the choice of such a polarizing figure, at such a delicate political moment, cannot have been accidental. [. . . . ]



Ottawa to review security -- And what about hiring the 3500 RCMP and CSIS officers to protect the rest of us Canadians?


Ottawa to review security

http://www.canoe.ca/NewsStand/
TorontoSun/News/2004/08/24/599407.html


August 24, 2004

THE FEDERAL government plans a sweeping examination of potential terrorist threats to federal politicians and judges, The Canadian Press has learned. Officials have ordered an independent review to identify security gaps in and around the cluster of Ottawa buildings that house parliamentarians, senior judges and their staffs.

The goal is to produce "threat and risk analyses" that will assess the "levels of vulnerability and protection" at federal sites in the national capital, an overview of the project says.



Missing Container Update

Corrupting entry port workers is done regularly, by putting people on the crooks' payroll; see the auditor-general's last report on ports and airport security. Smuggling drugs or weapons or people makes no difference since it's only the money that matters. Conscience has nothing to do with business while smuggling

RCMP saw red over hushed container theft -- Mounties found out 'through the back door' three days later

http://www.herald.ns.ca/
stories/2004/08/23/f188.raw.html


Murray Brewster, CP, Aug. 23, 04

[. . . . ] The glaring security lapse also came at a time when U.S. security officials were concerned about a possible terrorist attack in the weeks leading up to the Democratic National Convention in July.

[. . . . ] Despite the concerns, authorities do not believe the container carried any weapons of mass destruction, such as a radioactive dirty bomb, and did not pose a national security risk for either Canada or the United States.

Though they will not admit it publicly, police sources said they believe the crate was carrying drugs.

Authorities refuse to say where the container came from or what shipping line carried it.



Airport security scandal exposed -- UK -- but do you believe it is much better in our "kinder, gentler" Canada?

Airport security scandal exposed

http://
www.thesun.co.uk/
article/0,,2-2004391268,00.html


via Jack's Newswatch
http://www.jacksnewswatch.info/

AN undercover Sun reporter has exposed chilling security blunders — by smuggling a fake bomb on to a jet carrying more than 220 British holidaymakers.

ANTHONY FRANCE used bogus references to get a job as a baggage handler.

He then took the “bomb” unchallenged into the hold of the Thomas Cook 757-200 at Birmingham International Airport.

This is his story: [. . . . ]


It does not lead one to want to travel does it?


Vancouver Island Grow-op -- Strong indications of a sophisticated organization with access to both money and manpower

RCMP bust grow op: Vancouver Island site a sophisticated operation

http://
www.canada.com/national/nationalpost/
news/story.html?id=172f6e
34-4d82-4cac-824c-0812bd55c40b


Elaine Marshall, CanWest, August 24, 2004

[. . . . ] "It was huge," said Const. Michelle Hallam. "The guys describe it as two football fields ... you couldn't see from one end of the grow operation to the other."

More than 6,700 hundred marijuana plants were discovered growing on the remote bush property located northwest of Port Hardy on the northeast tip of Vancouver Island. After investigating the grow operation for weeks, RCMP officers from all over the north island moved in on the site Sunday morning. Two men were arrested and firearms and three guard dogs were seized.

The logistics of growing the 6,700 plants, moving them to the site and maintaining and protecting them until they were ready for harvest were all strong indications of a sophisticated organization with access to both money and manpower. "The size is definitely consistent with organized crime," Const. Hallam said. [. . . . ]



Bus travel: Toronto man caught at border with 3 guns -- Hands over loaded weapons peacefully

Toronto man caught at border with 3 guns -- Hands over loaded weapons peacefully

http://
www.canada.com/national/nationalpost/
news/story.html?id=374
601ab-98b0-4fec-92d4-c16691a5a61b


Adrian Humphreys, National Post, August 24, 2004

[. . . . ] Niagara police and CBSA officials confirmed that three handguns were seized -- two of them loaded and the third empty -- along with spare ammunition clips and an undisclosed quantity of bullets.

All of the powerful, semi-automatic guns were being carried with him and not packed in his luggage, officials said.

Officers would not speculate on the 25-year-old Scarborough man's motive, but the seizure raises the prospect that criminals in Scarborough may be re-arming after aggressive anti-gang and anti-gun operations by the Toronto Police Service.

[. . . . ] The man had memorized the names and numbers of two Toronto lawyers and instructed agents to call them in succession after his arrest, a source said.


How very prepared to know in advance that he might need lawyers -- a gang member, it appears. What lawyers are on call for this type of criminal? Are lawyers forced to take their business?


Beat cops showing the flag

http://
www.canada.com/montreal/montrealgazette/
news/story.html?id=78c7
a40f-ecee-4979-8fae-149180774a52


Last week, Canada's police chiefs warned street gangs were the next generation of organized crime. Two weeks earlier, Montreal police admitted that Ste. Catherine St. and St. Laurent Blvd. had become battlegrounds in a turf war between street gangs over drugs. Meanwhile, a series of late-night shootings and stabbings left Montrealers wondering whether they're in the midst of a crime wave. Gazette columnist James Mennie explored downtown with those who work after midnight. This is what he saw. [. . . . ]


Why are so many young people even willing to try drugs? What is being done to prevent children from starting? I had never heard of drugs until I was a young adult. Was it because communication was comparatively unsophisticated and we didn't know about so much going on in the world? Was it because a parent monitored everywhere we went and most of what we did? There was no TV and we had work to do. Poverty has its blessings. Whatever it was, it saved so many of us.


Arson destroys two homes and a boat

http://
www.canada.com/montreal/montrealgazette/
news/story.html?id=c32c1
cd0-cbcb-42f9-86a5-bc0041284a2d


Canadian Press, August 24, 2004

ST-CONSTANT, Que. - Two homes and a boat were destroyed by fire early Tuesday after police said Molotov cocktails were thrown in the boat. [. . . . ]



"Canada has nothing to be ashamed of when it comes to Olympic performances."

Keep Olympians off further dole -- Other policies needed to support athletes

http://
www.canada.com/national/nationalpost/
news/story.html?id=0b9183de-21
40-4a44-9e6b-bb31ace6e538


Diane Francis, Financial Post, August 24, 2004

[. . . . ] For instance, why shouldn't anyone, parent or otherwise, be able to deduct from their income taxes their financial support for an officially recognized, world-class athlete?

Likewise, corporations willing to subsidize such athletes directly should be allowed to do so. [. . . . ]



Former Liberian leader sold conflict diamonds to al-Qaeda -- report

http://
www.canada.com/national/nationalpost/
news/story.html?id=8ec670
d5-6731-442a-aecd-44aa54b4faf1


Lauren Gelfand, Agence France-Presse, August 24, 2004

DAKAR - Former Liberian president Charles Taylor sold conflict diamonds to known al-Qaeda operatives that may have been used to finance the Sept. 11 attacks on the United States, according to a confidential report from the UN-backed war crimes court in Sierra Leone.

"It is clear that al-Qaeda had been in West Africa since September, 1998, and maintained a continuous presence in the area through 2002," says the document, produced by the office of prosecutor David Crane.

[. . . . ] Mr. Taylor, who has so far eluded trial on charges he aided a rebellion against the government of Sierra Leone in 1991, is at the centre of the intricate relationship between al-Qaeda and Sierra Leone's Revolutionary United Front rebels.

According to U.S. officials quoted this month in the Boston Globe, Mr. Taylor extorted protection money from al-Qaeda operatives, among them Ahmed Khalfan Ghailani, a Tanzanian national who was arrested last month in Pakistan. [. . . . ]




List of Articles:

* Bud: The threat to Canada stares us in the face, but we are wilfully blinded to it

* 'Dirty' Bomb's Impact Studied -- There are lots of holes to plug

* Nuclear materials pose terror risk, expert says -- "Saudi al Qaeda activist Adnan al Shukrijumah suspected of Mexican connections is subject of search. DEBKA-Net-Weekly first exposed al Shukrijumah on Nov. 7, 2003 as sought by US and Canadian authorities of filching radioactive material from McMaster University for assembling a dirty bomb."

* Terrorists: Saudi Canadian al Qaeda activist Adnan al Shukrijumah, Mahmoud Mohammad Issa Mohammed who took part in the deadly assault on an El Al passenger plane in Athens in 1968 -- and those who expedite their efforts

* Adnan al Shukrijumah

* Link: FBI Seeking Information -- Adnan G. El Shukrijumah -- $5 MILLION reward! -- may be using a Canadian, Guyanese, Trinidadian or Saudi passport

* Link: Transcript of Adnan G. El Shukrijumah Video -- He gives a university presentation in English

* Then, there is this classic! Note that his lawyer (then), Marlys Edwardh, is one of the lawyers whose name is being mentioned as a potential Supreme Court of Canada Justice -- Stay tuned! (From what I have read, she seems to be of a lib/Lib bent -- a terrorist's dream SCOC justice, one who will protect "rights" -- theirs? or ours?)

* Title: From Far and Wide, Oh Canada, Terrorist Killers Come to Thee: A Review of Cold Terror: How Canada Nurtures and Exports Terrorism Around the World, by Stewart Bell -- Note mention of Mahmoud Mohammad Issa Mohammed -- and Jean Chretien's contribution to Canada's security -- to which I may have alluded previously

* Al Qaida said to recruit in Latin America -- mention of Honduras, Shukrijumah and Farida Goolam Mahamed Ahmed wading into the US from Mexico with a South African passport

* All is well in Canada, this "best of all possible worlds"? RCMP left in the dark about missing container -- Halifax, in Canada's Maritimes

* Highlights: Organized Crime at Marine Ports, Airports and Land Border Areas

* Ah, the "business investors" Canada needs! -- " It was a Chinese gentleman that I had met … (who) told me very early on nobody in Chinese culture does anything for nothing. " -- "according to former Royal Hong Kong Police Chief Detective Inspector Sandy Boucher, Canada was also gaining a reputation in organized crime circles as a haven for those mixed up in shady dealings. -- “We knew that many of our organized crime figures -- people with records, people without records but serious criminals – were looking to move to Canada,”

* Videos:

W-FIVE: Corruption and cover up, part one 10:46 min.

http://
www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/
story/CTVNews/1080323626556_1/?hub=WFive#



W-FIVE: Corruption and cover up, part two 9:55 min.

http://
www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/
CTVNews/1080323626556_1/?hub=WFive#



* ASIAN ORGANIZED CRIME AND TERRORIST ACTIVITY IN CANADA, 1999-2002, A Report Prepared by the Federal Research Division, Library of Congress under an Interagency Agreement with the United States Government, July 2003

http://
www.loc.gov/rr/frd/pdf-files/
AsianOrgCrime_Canada.pdf






Bud: The threat to Canada stares us in the face, but we are wilfully blinded to it


Evidence continues to mount that we are harbouring deadly Islamic terrorists in our midst, but the government's response to it is beyond weak-kneed. The Americans have a $5 million reward--yes, that is $5 MILLION--on one of our Muslim students from McMaster University for stealing radio-active material from its research labs. The response from Canadian media has been almost non-existent, but the Canadian Islamic Congress and their leftist sympathizers are adament that this is a witchhunt. This is the same crowd who refused--month after month--after the Sept. 11th atrocity to even admit that the perpetrators were Muslims, Islamist terrorists. Even after Ressam, Khadr and Jabarah were exposed, the vast number of Canadians have been led to believe that these were aberrations. The Liberal government and the NDP have formed a pact to obscure the real threat to Canada from these sleeper cells. With our government's policy of allowing people from terrorist-supporting countries to enter Canada -- to walk off a plane with no concrete proof of who they really are or where they came from, we are defenseless. Already, we have almost 40,000 deportees who have skipped being deported and the government won't even give the police their descriptions and names, because it might offend their privacy rights. Well, excuse me, but what rights of any kind do deportees--now fugitives--have? Chr***! Even our own bad guys don't have these 'rights'.

The only light at the end of this tunnel of criminal stupidity will come when Joe Canadian is attacked in a stunning manner. Then, their lamentations will reach the sky: "How did our supposed leaders allow this treachery?" No matter how the Liberals try to spin this, they are going down to total defeat. Unfortunately, their years of neglect ensure it will be too late to stop the inflitration that their years of loonie-left policies have inculcated. Police sources with massive amounts of supporting evidence of these dangers have alerted many of us to the growing threat and the government's lassitude in the face of it. Wouldn't want to lose that solid Muslim vote now, would we? Well, you folks just go on amusing yourselves to death. Go on buying into the fallacy that all cultures are benign and equal. Who wants to think about these gathering storms while "Canadian Idol" is starting a new season?

Bud -- A.K.A. Cassandra

Eds' comment: It is our government's leaders--with all their tentacles--that are wilfully blinded to the threats, Bud, not a goodly number of the rest of us. Our government is criminal in its negligence in funding our security. They will be sorry!


Lots of holes to plug: 'Dirty' Bomb's Impact Studied

The 9/11 Commission on intelligence is just a start. There's lots to do where the rubber meets the road. Taken separately, these are just scenarios; together, they could add up to the ingredients needed for an attack. Much of the material that follows is from a few months ago but assembled here, for effect. I believe these paint a picture that it would be wise for Canadians to study -- a North American version of Edvard Munch's "The Scream", stolen by masked gunmen in the last day or so from the major Vienna--or is it Munich?--art gallery.

'Dirty' Bomb's Impact Studied

http://
www.latimes.com/news/local/
la-me-terrorism22aug22,1,4561433,print.story


David Pierson, L A Times, August 22, 2004

A radioactive "dirty" bomb detonated at the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach could cause a $34-billion loss to the nation's economy, according to researchers at a two-day symposium that focused on the economic impact of terrorism.

The scenario was one of many discussed by experts Saturday at the conference, which was hosted by USC's new Center for Risk and Economic Analysis of Terrorism Events.

Researchers from about a dozen universities and think tanks debated the potential costs, including the effect a radiological attack would have on the nation's power grid, the impact on transportation if bridges in Seattle were destroyed and the progress of U.S. efforts to upgrade port security. [. . . . ]

"The Coast Guard has to learn new things it has never learned, like a live boarding of a hostile ship," Shatz said.

Clark Abt, who runs a social and economic policy research and consulting firm, said it was imperative that the United States pay for overseas scanners to detect nuclear weapons before they reach the U.S. coastline.

"The Coast Guard and Customs are used to drugs, . . . .

"Containers are missing [connecting with] sailings to be inspected," said White, who studied inspections at Singapore's port. "Ships don't wait for containers."



Nuclear materials pose terror risk, expert says -- "Saudi al Qaeda activist Adnan al Shukrijumah suspected of Mexican connections is subject of search. DEBKA-Net-Weekly first exposed al Shukrijumah on Nov. 7, 2003 as sought by US and Canadian authorities of filching radioactive material from McMaster University for assembling a dirty bomb."

Nuclear materials pose terror risk, expert says

http://
www.canoe.ca/NewsStand/LondonFree
Press/News/2004/08/21/594603.html


Aug. 21, 04, London Free Press/CP

TORONTO -- Terrorists would have easy pickings at hundreds of Ontario university labs and businesses with radioactive materials on hand, the Radiation Safety Institute of Canada says. The danger is materials could be placed on subways and in malls to spook the public, Fergal Nolan, chief executive of the Toronto-based institute, told a legislative committee updating Ontario's Emergency Management Act.

[. . . . ] Nolan said Ontario companies are among the world's biggest manufacturers of radioactive materials for medical use -- chemicals, gases and devices that in the wrong hands, could cause harm.

[. . . . ] The Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission is doing safety audits at 40 universities because "there is a lot of concern," Nolan added.



Terrorists: Saudi Canadian al Qaeda activist Adnan al Shukrijumah, Mahmoud Mohammad Issa Mohammed who took part in the deadly assault on an El Al passenger plane in Athens in 1968 -- and those who expedite their efforts

Adnan al Shukrijumah

Saudi al Qaeda activist Adnan al Shukrijumah suspected of Mexican connections is the subject of an FBI search. Debka-Net-Weekly

http://debka.com/


first exposed al Shukrijumah on Nov. 7, 2003 as sought by US and Canadian authorities of filching radioactive material from McMaster University for assembling a dirty bomb. There is more on Adnan G. El Shukrijumah if you scroll down further, along with others.

"Saudi al Qaeda activist Adnan al Shukrijumah suspected of Mexican connections is subject of search. DEBKA-Net-Weekly first exposed al Shukrijumah on Nov. 7, 2003 as sought by US and Canadian authorities of filching radioactive material from McMaster University for assembling a dirty bomb."


There is much more information but I am simply pressed for time. Please look up these links and read carefully.


FBI: Seeking Information: Adnan G. El Shukrijumah -- $5 MILLION reward! -- may be using a Canadian, Guyanese, Trinidadian or Saudi passport
http://www.fbi.gov/terrorinfo/adnan.htm

Transcript of Adnan G. El Shukrijumah Video -- He gives a university presentation in English

http://
www.fbi.gov/terrorinfo/adnan-text.htm



Then, there is this classic! Note that his lawyer (then), Marlys Edwardh, is one of the lawyers whose name is being mentioned as a potential Supreme Court of Canada Justice -- Stay tuned!

Mahmoud Mohammad Issa Mohammed who took part in the deadly assault on an El Al passenger plane in Athens in 1968

http://www.google.ca/
search?q=cache:6CHZNo4oik8J:www.global-econ
omics.ca/coldterror.htm+Mo
hammed+issa+mohammed&hl=en


This came from a Toronto Star article, Toronto, Ont., Jan 23, 1988. pg. A.12

This guy's been in Canada since 1987 and they can't get him out. That's why Canada is deemed a safe haven for terrorists and crooks. He was last living in the Hamilton area. His lawyer at the time in 1988 is the same one representing Arar at the Arar inquiry. What a coincidence! -- WHO IS PAYING FOR EXPENSIVE LAWYERS anyway? Follow the money!

Mahmoud Mohammad Issa Mohammed who took part in the deadly assault on an El Al passenger plane in Athens in 1968; . . . .

Mohammad was convicted in Greece in 1970 for the 1968 attack on an El Al jetliner in Athens, in which an Israeli man was killed. He was released and deported to Lebanon a year later as part of a hostage exchange.

Using a false name, Mohammad gained landed immigrant status in Canada a year ago, and although immigration officials were alerted to his true identity before he arrived, on Feb. 26, 1987, he slipped through security at Pearson International Airport in Toronto.



Title: From Far and Wide, Oh Canada, Terrorist Killers Come to Thee: A Review of Cold Terror: How Canada Nurtures and Exports Terrorism Around the World, by Stewart Bell -- Note mention of Mahmoud Mohammad Issa Mohammed -- and Jean Chretien's contribution to Canada's security -- to which I may have alluded previously

Google cache of Title: From Far and Wide, Oh Canada, Terrorist Killers Come to Thee: A Review of Cold Terror: How Canada Nurtures and Exports Terrorism Around the World, by Stewart Bell

http://
www.global-economics.ca/coldterror.htm


The Globe and Mail Book Review, April 10, 2004. To link to or bookmark this page, use this url

http://
www.google.com/search?q=cache:6CHZNo4oik8J:www.global-economics.ca/coldterrohttp://www.goog
le.car.htm+Mohammed+issa+mohammed&hl=en


Canadians will be madder than hell after they read Stewart Bell's shocking account of how the Canadian Government has allowed Sihk, Tamil and Islamic terrorists to come into our home and turn it into a safe house for international terror.

Bell, who writes for the National Post and is Canada's leading reporter on national security and terrorism, has taken on the courageous task of warning Canadians about the terrorists living amongst us. This has stirred up a real hornets' nest. He has been threatened by many who don't like his message and has been branded as anti-Islamic by the Canadian Islamic Congress. Such is the fate of those who say what others are afraid to say.


Note, I have mentioned CIC and its President, Mr. El Masry of the University of Waterloo Computer Science department, before. Check my archives for his views of interest to Canadians and the direction of his influence.

Bell's litany of terrorist incidents around the world involving Canadian terrorists is long enough to qualify Canada for membership in the Axis of Evil. The most infamous are: the 1985 Air India bombing; the 1991 assassination of Indian Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi; the 1993 World Trade Centre bombing in New York; the 1993 assassination of Sri Lankan President Ranasinghe Premadasa; the 1995 blast at the Egyptian embassy in Islamabad; the murder of 58 tourists in Egypt in 1997; the 1997 truck explosion in Sri Lanka that killed 100; the bloody Bali night club bombings in 2002; and the 2003 attack on the housing compound in Riyadh.

Bell provides many examples of terrorists who took advantage of liberal immigration and refugee policies to enter Canada. A few of the most notorious bogus refugees include: Manickavasagam Suresh, the Canadian leader of the Tamil Tigers; Mahmoud Mohammad Issa Mohammed who took part in the deadly assault on an El Al passenger plane in Athens in 1968; Essam Marzouk, who trained the bombers of the U.S. Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania in 1998; and Ahmed Ressam, the wannabe Millennium LA airport bomber, who was caught at the Port Angeles border trying to sneak into the U.S. with a carload of explosives.

[. . . . ] According to Bell's diagnosis of the problem, "CSIS and the RCMP have been effective at monitoring the activities of terrorist groups operating in Canada, but they have been unable to put them out of business, in large part because their political masters have not given them the tools they need to do so." . . . .

Bell names the prominent politicians who he feels have contributed to the terrorist problem. He contends that former Prime Minister Jean Chrétien never really recognized the seriousness of the terrorist threat. The best evidence of Prime Minister Chrétien naivety was the way he was so easily manipulated into putting in a good word with Pakistan Prime Minister Bhutto to get Ahmed Khadr released from prison in Pakistan.

While the Sikh and Tamil homeland wars are troubling enough, Bell worries most about al-Qaeda-style radical Islam because it preaches and practices "violence without limits" and "serves not only a strategic purpose, but fulfills the will of God." To Islamic terrorists, chemical, nuclear and biological weapons are "the bigger, the better." He observes that "their hatred arises from centuries-old grievances and their aim is long term: a world under the rule of Islam, the one true faith." Scary!



Al Qaida said to recruit in Latin America -- mention of Honduras, Shukrijumah and Farida Goolam Mahamed Ahmed who was caught wading into the US from Mexico carrying a South African passport

AL-QAIDA SAID TO RECRUIT IN LATIN AMERICA

http://
www.kfmb.com/topstory28454.html


(08-21-2004) - Governments throughout Mexico and Central America are on alert as evidence grows that al-Qaida members are traveling in the region and looking for recruits to carry out attacks in Latin America - the potential last frontier for international terrorism.

The territory could be a perfect staging ground for Osama bin Laden's militants, with homegrown rebel groups, drug and people smugglers, and corrupt governments. U.S. officials have long feared al-Qaida could launch an attack from south of the border, and they have been paying closer attention as the number of terror-related incidents has increased since last year.

The strongest possible al-Qaida link is Adnan G. El Shukrijumah, a 29-year-old Saudi pilot suspected of being a terrorist cell leader. The FBI issued a border-wide alert earlier this month for Shukrijumah, saying he may try to cross into Arizona or Texas.

In June, Honduran officials said Shukrijumah was spotted earlier this year at an Internet cafe in Tegucigalpa, the capital of Honduras. Panamanian officials say the pilot and alleged bombmaker passed through their country before the Sept. 11 attacks on the United States.

U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft in May singled out Shukrijumah as one of seven especially dangerous al-Qaida-linked terror figures wanted by the government, which fears a new al-Qaida attack. A $5 million reward is posted for information leading to his capture.

[. . . . ] Officials worry the Panama Canal could be a likely target. In 2003, boats making more than 13,000 trips through the waterway carried about 188 million tons of cargo.


It might be useful to check who controls security for all the ships that pass through the portals at either end of the Panama Canal. The use of these ports has been won by one of Hong Kong billionaire Li Ka Shing's companies, as I have mentioned before. (Check Mar. 1, 04 post.)

Earlier this month, the United States and seven Latin American countries - including Argentina, Chile, Colombia, the Dominican Republic, Honduras, Peru and Panama - carried out a weeklong anti-terror exercise aimed at protecting the canal.

In South America, U.S. officials have long suspected Paraguay's border with Brazil and Argentina as an area for Islamic terrorist fund-raising. Much of the focus has fallen on the Muslim community that sprouted during the 1970s, and authorities believe as much as $100 million a year flows out of the region, with large portions diverted to Islamic militants linked to Hezbollah and the Palestinian militant group Hamas.

The more immediate concern is Mexico, which shares a porous, 2,000-mile border with the United States and is the home to widespread organized crime.

[. . . . ] Concerns increased this summer about whether Mexico was doing enough to screen international visitors after a 48-year-old South African woman arrived in Mexico with a passport that was missing several pages and then waded across the Rio Grande into Texas.

Farida Goolam Mahamed Ahmed was arrested July 19 while trying to board a flight in McAllen, Texas. She pleaded innocent Friday to immigration violations and was under investigation for links to terrorist activities or groups. Court testimony indicated she traveled from Johannesburg on July 8, via Dubai, United Arab Emirates, to London, then to Mexico City on or about July 14. The countries she traveled through do not require South Africans to have visas.



All is well in this "best of all possible worlds"? RCMP left in the dark about missing container -- Halifax, in Canada's Maritimes

RCMP left in the dark about missing container

http://
cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Law/
2004/08/22/597521-cp.html



HALIFAX (CP) - It took three days for Canada's national police force to be told that a suspicious shipping container was missing from a Halifax pier last spring.

The theft of the boxcar-size crate in mid-April and the delay in reporting it initially sent shivers through senior ranks of the RCMP, Canada's lead federal agency in the war on terrorism.

The delay "was more than enough time" for a potential terrorist to drive the container up to -and possibly over -the U.S. border, said a senior RCMP source, who spoke to The Canadian Press on the condition of anonymity.

Compounding the problem, customs officers with the Canada Border Services Agency couldn't say exactly when the huge, metal container was stolen -only that the theft happened some time between April 10 and April 20.

The glaring security lapse also came at a time when U.S. security officials were concerned about a possible terrorist attack in the weeks leading up to the Democratic National Convention in July.

The container has yet to be found. [. . . . ]

"We found out about it through the back door," the source said. Given the heightened state of security at Canada's ports, "we would have expected (customs) to notify us the moment it was (reported) missing."

Senior Mounties were furious because a special task force that included the RCMP, the Canada Border Services Agency, military police and Halifax Regional Police was set up at the port in 2003 to prevent this kind of oversight.


How could anyone commandeer a CRANE which would be necessary for this -- unless some people working at or allowed to enter the environs of the port were in cahoots? Answer that, our lax government. And Anne McLellan still thinks we have no terrorist problem here? It may not be terrorist-related, but, this is just a sample of what is possible, Anne.


Organized Crime at Marine Ports, Airports and Land Border Areas

http://
www.cisc.gc.ca/AnnualReport
2004/Cisc2004/ports2004.html


Highlights

* Organized crime exploits marine ports, airports and land border areas to smuggle contraband and people into Canada.

* In some instances, the exploitation of marine ports and airports by organized crime involves either the corruption of existing employees or the placement of criminal associates into the port work forces to facilitate criminal activities.

[. . . . ] In the Atlantic provinces, the Ports of Saint John and Halifax have been connected in the past to smuggling attempts.

[. . . . ] Outlook

* Due to the large volume of commercial traffic, the major container ports of Canada remain vulnerable as conduits for contraband entering Canada; in some instances criminal elements influencing or operating within the ports will aid in the smuggling.

* Canada’s airports will continue to remain vulnerable to criminal exploitation and infiltration particularly at the major international airports that receive frequent flights from either source or transit countries for various types of contraband, such as illicit drugs.

* Organized crime will continue to exploit both the large volume of land commercial and traveler movement between the U.S. and Canada to smuggle commodities, currency and people in both directions. As well, organized crime will exploit the less-monitored areas between the designated customs ports of entry.


You are careless of your own safety if you do not familiarize yourself with all of these reports. See posts Aug. 22 and 23, 04 for the links.


Ah, the "business investors" Canada needs! -- " It was a Chinese gentleman that I had met … (who) told me very early on nobody in Chinese culture does anything for nothing. " -- "according to former Royal Hong Kong Police Chief Detective Inspector Sandy Boucher, Canada was also gaining a reputation in organized crime circles as a haven for those mixed up in shady dealings. -- “We knew that many of our organized crime figures -- people with records, people without records but serious criminals – were looking to move to Canada,”

Since RCMP Cpl Read was sacked, what's been done to protect Canadians--besides writing reports year after year? Look at the background to his story and events in Hong Kong.

Corruption and cover up

http://
www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/
story/CTVNews/1080323626556_1/?hub=WFive


CTV.ca News Staff, March 27, 2004

In the 1990s, before Hong Kong was reverted from British to Chinese control, millions of residents were looking to relocate. . . .

One such immigrant was Lee Chau Ping, a notorious drug trafficker who is known as the Ice Queen. In 1992, after police raided her labs and one of her safe houses, the Ice Queen got on a plane headed for Canada. Not thinking that the Canadian government would let her stay, [former Royal Hong Kong Police Chief Detective Inspector Sandy Boucher] assumed the Ice Queen had headed oversees to wait for the heat on her gang to die down a little. So he was shocked when an RCMP officer told him she had been granted landed immigrant status.

“I said, ‘It can’t be – she’s got a criminal record. I know she’s known to Canadian authorities.’”

But apparently, Lee Chau Ping – who posed as a businesswoman ready to invest $170,000 in a Chicken Delight franchise in a tiny town in northern Saskatchewan – had slipped under the radar. And Brian McAdam, the immigration control officer at the High Commission in Hong Kong, soon learned that other criminals had too.

“I discovered that these Triad people (members of secret Chinese organized crime fraternities that have ties to members of the Hong Kong business community) were regulars at getting visas to visit their families or go on holidays as the case may be, and yet clearly on the file was intelligence information identifying who they were.”

McAdam was puzzled as to how known criminals were able to get into Canada, but a little bit of digging turned up connections between the Triad members and officials working inside the Canadian embassy. In fact, according to McAdam, High Commission staff was on the receiving end of expensive gifts, cocktail parties, yacht trips and visits to the casinos in Macau. [well known for gambling--sorry, that's "gaming", isn't it?]

[. . . . ] The man told W-FIVE that the corruption at the High Commission was a “fairly open secret” among Hong Kong’s middle class. He said Triad members, including “famous businessmen, solicitors, legislators (and) accountants” used to invite embassy staff to the races and lavish parties.

[. . . . ] The source told W-FIVE he was never aware of the exact price for a Canadian visa, but he estimated the entry cost for a Triad member’s family would be in the neighbourhood of $500,000 HK. And he said the corruption was far and wide within the embassy. “Without help from insiders it won’t work. … It takes more than one person in the High Commission to get the job done, not just one single person – there must be big, big scandal behind it all.”

[. . . . several names mentioned here, including RCMP Cpl. Robert Read -- check Google for him; you'll learn much more. ]

And Read wasn’t the only member of the RCMP to be shut down by the force. In 1993, Staff Sergeant Jim Puchniak requested permission to go to Hong Kong to conduct a full investigation, but he was told by the RCMP liason officer at the mission, Inspector Gary Lagamodiere, that doing so would upset the High Commissioner.

[. . . . ] But [RCMP Cpl.] Read appealed his dismissal, and in 2003, the RCMP’s External Review Committee issued a scathing indictment over the handling of the Hong Kong affair. In its decision the committee wrote the “the RCMP was walking on eggshells whenever it conducted an investigation into activities at a Canadian mission abroad and basically restricted to what the Department of Foreign Affairs was willing to allow it to investigate.

[. . . . ] While the report clearly vindicated Read, the RCMP has refused to reinstate him – a decision he is fighting in Federal Court. But because he never got the investigation he wanted into the Canadian High Commission in Hong Kong, questions about the depth of the corruption and political interference there will probably never be answered. Both John Higgenbotham, the Canadian High Commissioner in Hong Kong from 1989 to 1994, and RCMP Superintendent Giuliano Zaccardelli – people who may be able to lend some perspective to the unanswered questions -- refused to be interviewed by W-FIVE. . . .


A Canadian High Commissioner and the head of our RCMP -- now, who did/do these people report to? Who had/has more clout? Who is/are their superior(s) in the chain of command? Who could/can shut down the needed investigation? Why won't the questions ever be answered? Would it get too close to "the top"? -- the top of what?


Videos:

W-FIVE: Corruption and cover up, part one 10:46 min.

http://
www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/
story/CTVNews/1080323626556_1/?hub=WFive#


W-FIVE: Corruption and cover up, part two 9:55 min.
http://
www.ctv.ca/servlet/
ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/
1080323626556_1/?hub=WFive#

See this lengthy and informative US report, ASIAN ORGANIZED CRIME AND TERRORIST ACTIVITY IN CANADA, 1999-2002, A Report Prepared by the Federal Research Division, Library of Congress under an Interagency Agreement with theUnited States Government, July 2003

http://
www.loc.gov/rr/frd/pdf-files/
AsianOrgCrime_Canada.pdf


-- Researcher: Neil S. Helfand, Project Manager: David L. Osborne, Federal Research Division, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C.

If you start researching, you will find much more. It just takes time.